Shrikishn Singh vs. Altus Uber
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Direction
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar
Listed On:
6 Dec 2022
Order Text
6-COMAS10-2020.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION
COMM ADMIRALTY SUIT NO. 10 OF 2020
Shrikishan Singh & ors. ...Plaintiffs Versus
Altus Uber and ors. …Defendants
Mr. Akshay Chavan, a/w Ms. Medhavi Mathur, i/b Vishwakarma & Asso., for the Plaintiffs. Mr. Ruchir Goenka, a/w Mr. Raghvendra Desai, i/b Bose & Mitra & Co., for Defendant no.1. Ms. Roshni Naik, i/b Anil Agarwal, for Defendant no.3.
CORAM: N. J. JAMADAR, J. DATED : 20th DECEMBER, 2022
PC:-
-
In the order dated 6th December, 2022, in the appearance, "Mr. Ruchir Goenka a/w Mr. Raghvendra Desai, i/b Bose & Mitra & Co., for Defendant No.2" be corrected as "Mr. Ruchir Goenka a/w Mr. Raghvendra Desai, i/b Bose & Mitra & Co., for Defendant No.1".
-
Rest of the order remains unaltered.
-
Order dated 6th December, 2022 be corrected and uploaded.
-
The learned Counsel for the plaintiffs submits that the summons could not be served on defendant no.2 in the usual
SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI
Digitally signed by SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.12.24 11:55:24 +0530
6-COMAS10-2020.DOC
mode. An affidavit of service dated 1st October, 2022 is filed. It indicates that respondent no.2 is not available at the given address.
-
The learned Counsel seeks leave to serve respondent no.2 by way of substituted service.
-
The prayer seems justifiable as the summons could not be served on defendant no.2 in the usual mode.
-
The plaintiffs are at liberty to serve defendant no.2 by way of substituted service in the nature of newspaper publication.
-
The returnable date of Writ of Summons stands extended till 21st February, 2023.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order