Abhay Ramniklal Mehta vs. Jimisha Abhay Mehta
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Appeals For Admission - Fresh Civil Side Matters
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice D.K. Deshmukh , Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anoop V. Mohta
Listed On:
21 Sept 2011
Order Text
Kambli
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.13 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.6993 OF 2010
...
Abhay R. Mehta ...Appellant v/s. Jimisha Mehta ...Respondent
Mr.Abad Ponda i/b Mr.H.P.Ingale for the Appellant. Mr.S.K.Talsaniya, Sr.Advocate i/b Nityah Sunil & Associates for the Respondent.
...
...
CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ
DATED: 21st September, 2011
P.C.:
The learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant states that the Appellant should be given eight weeks time to deposit in this court the balance amount of maintenance, which, according to him, is Rs. 4,56,500/-. He further states that in case he fails to deposit this amount within the aforesaid period, then his Appeal be treated as dismissed.
Statement is accepted.
In view of this statement, following order would meet the ends of justice.
O R D E R
- (i) In case the Appellant deposits in this court with due notice to the Respondent Rs.4,56,500/- within a period of eight weeks from today, the Letters Patent Appeal be placed before the court for further orders;
- (ii) In case the amount is not deposited, the Letters Patent Appeal should be treated as disposed of.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
LETTERS PATENT APPEAL NO.12 OF 2011 IN WRIT PETITION NO.9114 OF 2010
...
Abhay R. Mehta ...Appellant v/s. Jimisha Mehta ...Respondent
Mr.Abad Ponda i/b Mr.H.P.Ingale for the Appellant. Mr.S.K.Talsaniya, Sr.Advocate i/b Nityah Sunil & Associates for the Respondent.
...
...
CORAM: D.K.Deshmukh & Anoop V. Mohta, JJ
DATED: 21st September, 2011
P.C.:
Admit. Heard finally by consent of parties.
- By consent of parties, all interim directions issued by the learned single Judge by order dated 8-12-2010 passed in Writ Petition No.9114 of 2010 are set aside. It is clarified that the order admitting Writ Petition No.9114 of 2010 is not disturbed and the learned single Judge is free to hear that petition at an early date. It 4 LPA13.11
is also clarified that so far as the order of the Family Court granting maintenance in favour of the daughter of the Appellant is concerned, the Respondent shall be at liberty to adopt such remedy as may be available in law for execution of that order. Appeal disposed of.
(ANOOP V. MOHTA, J.) (D.K.DESHMUKH,J.)
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order