The Spl. Deputy Collector-Land Acquisition vs. Yetti Driver Kambanna
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
7 Apr 2016
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
AND
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANIS
LAAS Nos. 308, 315, 336 of 2013, LAAS Nos. 26, 272, 308, 319 of 2014, LAAS Nos. 216, 217, 253 of 2013, LAAS Nos. 319, 320, 383, 330 of 2013, LAAS Nos. 24, 25, 29, 96, 321 of 2014, LAAS Nos. 385, 500, 503, 517, 546, 554, 583, 625 of 2013, LAAS Nos. 31, 239, 33, 67, 214, 237, 248, 299, 327, 395, 398 of 2014
LAAS Nos.26,27,28,29, 30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,44,46,47,48,49,51,52,53,54
55,56,59,61,62,63,64,65,66,72,76,77,78,79,80,84,90,94,96,9798,103,108,115,118,119,120,121,122,125,126,127,129,130, 132,134,135,136,137,138,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,171,172,174,175,176,177,178,184,185,202,204,205,206,208,209,210,211,212,214,215,218,219,220,221,222,224,381,382,384,386,387,388,391,392,393,394,395,396,397,398,399,400,401,402,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411,412,413,414,417,418,420,421,422,423,425,426,427,428,430,432,434,435,436,437,446,470,473,474,501,502,504,505,506,507,508,509,510,511,512,513,514,515,516,518,519,521,522,523,524,525,526,527,528,529,532,533,536,538,540,543,544,545,547,552,553,557,558,560,563,564,565,568,569,570,571,572,573,588,589,608,622,626,627,629,631,632,633 of 2013
LAAS Nos.5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,14,15,16,17,18,19,20, 21,22,23, 27,28, 30,32,34,35,61,68,69,70,71,72,73,74, 97,98,99, 100, 102,103,104,105,106,107,109,110,111,112,113,114,142,143,167,169, 170,171,172,177,180,182,185,186,187,193,195,201, 204,205 of 2014
COMMON JUDGMENT ORDER: (Per Hon'ble Sri Justice Nooty Ramamohana Rao)
The learned Government Pleader as well as Sri Rathangapani Reddy have stated before us that the
judgment passed in L.A.A.S No.213 of 2013 would govern all the remaining appeals as well, as the issue
involved in all the cases is one and the same.
Accordingly, all these appeals stand allowed for the same reasons and to the extent indicated, by us, in our judgment rendered in L.A.A.S No.213 of 2013.
Miscellaneous applications pending if any shall also stand closed. No costs.
JUSTICE NOOTY RAMAMOHANA RAO
_______________________________________
_______________ JUSTICE ANIS
07.04.2016 Sp