Paladugula Ramachandram vs. State Of A.P.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
First Hearing
Listed On:
10 Sept 2013
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF ANDRHA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN :PRESENT : THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B. CHANDRA KUMAR CRL.P.No. 9617 of 2013.
Between :-
1.Paladugula Ramachandram S/o. Kondayya
2.Paladugula Kondayya S/o. Veerraju.
..Petitioners/ Accused Nos. 1 & 2 in Crime No. 111 of 2013 on the file of Seethanagaram, Police Station, Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.
.AND
State of A.P., rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad.
..Respondent/Complainant.
Petition under Section 438 of Cr.P.C .praying that in the circumstances stated in the memo of grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to enlarge them on bail in anticipation of their arrest in Crime No.111 of 2013 on the file of Seethanagaram P.S., Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District and petitioners abide by the condition or conditions that might be imposed by this Hon'ble Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the memo of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri M. Sivananda Kumar, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondent- State, the Court made the following
ORDER:-
"This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C., seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest in connection with Crime No.111 of 2013 on the file of Seethanagaram P.S., Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District, which was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 324, 354, 506 and 34 IPC.
Heard both sides.
The petitioners are alleged to have abused the defacto complainant and his wife and beat them. The $1^{st}$ petitioner is alleged to have beat with iron road and caused bleeding injuries. The $2^{nd}$ petitioner is aged 68 years. Having regard to the age of the $2^{nd}$ petitioner, I am inclined to grant bail to the $2^{nd}$ petitioner.
Accordingly, the 2<sup>nd</sup> petitioner is directed to surrender before the investigating officer within two weeks from today and on such surrender, he shall be released on bail on his executing personal bond for Rs.5,000/- with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting officer. As far as the 1<sup>st</sup> petitioner is concerned, he may surrender before the concerned Magistrate and seek regular bail. In the event of such surrender, the same may be considered by the concerned Magistrate on the same day. Subject to the observations made above, the petition stands dismissed in so far as 1 st petitioner is concerned.
Accordingly, the criminal petition is partly allowed."
Sd/- P. SREENIVASULU, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
for ASSISTANT REGISTRAR Contd…2…
- 2 -
To
- 1.The V Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
- 2.The Station House Officer, Seethanagaram P.S., Rajahmundry Urban, East Godavari District.
3.Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad (OUT)
4.One CC to Sri M. Sivananda Kumar, Advocate (OPUC)
5.One spare copy
TKK
HIGH COURT
BCK.J
DATE: 10-09-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER
CRL.P. No. 9617 of 2013
BAIL GRANTED TO PETITIONER NO.2
DRAFTED BY TKK DT :12-09-2013.
HIGH COURT
BCK.J
DATE: 10-09-2013
ANTICIPATORY BAIL ORDER
CRL.P. No. 9617 of 2013
BAIL GRANTED TO PETITIONER NO.2.
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order