IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY. THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 30895 OF 2018

Between:

Ch. Janardhan, S/o Mallaiah aged Major Occ. Agriculture R/o5-7-614. Road No.5. Near water Tank.T.S.Housing Board colony Karimnagar.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rept by the Principal secretary.Co-operation Department. Secretariat, Hyderabad.
• 2. The joint collector /PIC/Chairman, The Karimnagar coperative Urban Bank Ltd. Karimnagar.
• 3. The District Coperative Officer, C/o collectors complex.Karimnagar.
• 4. A.Madhusudan Reddy, S/o A.Raji Reddyv aged major Occ Asst Accountant in Karimnagar cooperative Urban bank Near Venkateshwar Temple Market Road Karimnagar Town.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order or a direction one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the Respondents in not considering the representation of the petitioner date 13th and 16th july 2018 as illegal, contrary to law and judicial precedents.

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 herein not to release the retiral benifits till the representation of the petitioner dated 13-7-2018 and 16-7-2018 are considered pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI J.C.FRANCIS Counsel for the Respondents No.1to3 : GP FOR COOPERATION Counsel for the Respondents No.4: The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPT' RAJESHUTAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.30895 of 2018

ORDER:

I

On lO.lO.2O23 and O2.1I.2023, none appeared for the petitioner, this Court directed the Registry to list th,: matter under the caption for dismissal,. Today, though the rnatter is listed under the caption for dismissal,, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Court is of the considered view that the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter.

2. Accordingly, this Writ petition is dismissed lbr non_ prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shalI stand closed.

SD/-N. SRIHARI //rRUE COPY// ASSISTANT*9y** SECTION'OFFICER

• ¹9n" CC to SRt J.C.FRANC|S, Advocate. tOpUCl ²Two ccs to Gp FoR coopERATioN, High 6o',1rt ro,. the state of rerangana at Hyderabad IOUTI 3. Two CD Copiei.
• BSK GJP 6

To,

l

HIGH COURT

DATED:16/11/2023

ORDER

WP.No.30895 of 2018

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS