HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE PULLA KARTHIK

WRIT PETITION NOS: 32497, 32519, 32576, 32580 AND 32862 OF 2023

W.P.NO: 32497 OF 2023

Between:

Smt. CH.Srivani, M.A.(English), D/o. CH.Durgaiah, Aged about 36 years, Occ. Contract Lecturer in English, Presently Working at Govt., Polytechnic Maheshwaram

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Higher Education (Technical Education), Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government of Telangana State.
• 5. The Government Polytechnic for Women, Rep by its Principal, Govt., Polytechnic Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings File No.CTE-EST2/SMSL/ 20/2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part (1) dated. 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-1/2014, dated 26-02-016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the

services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-

2023 as an illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, whimsical, non-application of mind, unlawful, unconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,16and21 of the Constitution of India and also against the catena of judgments of this Honble Court and an Apex Court and set-aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No CTE-EST2/SMSL/20/2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1) dated 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM- 1/2014, dated 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 with consequential benefits.

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till regularize the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2/SMSL/20/2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1) dated. $01-08-2023$ in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-1/2014, dated. 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated. 01-05-2023 forthwith.

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1stand the 2nd respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dtd.12-05-2023 and to regularize the services of the petitioner as

English Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd

respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 20/ 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated. 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/ A3/HRM4/2014, dated. 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 forthwith.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I

W.P.NO: 32519 OF 2023

Between:

G. Srinu, M.Sc(Mathematics), S/o. G.Ramulu, Aged about 35 years, Occ. Contract Lecturer in Mathematics, Presently Working at Model Residential Polytechnic(GMRP) at Manuguru, Badradri Kothegudem District

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Technical Education, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government of Telangana State.
• 5. The Government Model Residential Polytechnic(GMRP), Rep by its Principal, Model Residential Polytechnic(GMRP) at Manuguru, Badradri Kothegudem District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings File No.CTE-EST2/SMSL/20/ 2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part (1) dated.01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26/02/2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-1/2014, dated 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the

services vide G-o.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated ^0110512023 as an illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, un.iust, unfair, unreasonable, whimsical' non-application of mind, unlawful, u nconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,16 and 21 0f the constitution of lndia and also against the catena of ludgments of this Honourable court and an Apex court and set-aside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No c I E-EST2/SM SLl2Ot 2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1) dated 0110812023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE (HRM.l) DEPARTMENT, daled 26-02- 2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-112014, daled 26t02t2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No.31, Higher Education (TE) Department, dated.01/05/2023 with consequential benefits.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till regularization of the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 211d respondent vide Proceedings File No CTE-EST2/SMSL/2Ol 2022-ESTABLISHIvIENT-2CTE-Part(1) dated. 0110812023 in pursuance of the G.O.tvls. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.l) DEPARTMENT, dated' 26102t2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/ 51/ A3/HRM-1t2014, daled. 26t02t2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department, dated' 0110512023 forthwith.

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under section 15'1 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the '1st and the 2nd resoondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dt:12105t2023 and to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics

Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd CTE-EST2/SMSL/20/2022-No. Proceedings File vide respondent ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated: 01/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated: 26/02/2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/ A3/HRM-1/2014, dated: 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 forthwith.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I

W.P.NO: 32576 OF 2023

Between:

P. Venkateshwarlu, M.Sc (Maths), S/o. Yesu, Aged about 36 years, Caste. SC, Occ. Contract Lecturer in Mathematics Working at Government Polytechnic Kothagudem, District. BadradriKothegudem.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 2. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principle Secretary to the Higher Education(Technical Education), Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government of Telangana State.
• 5. The Government Polytechnic, Rep by its Principal, Government Polytechnic, KothegudemDistrict, BadradriKothegudem, T.S.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings File No.CTE-EST2/SMSL/20/2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part (1), dated. 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-I/2014,

dated 26-02-016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services

vide G.O.Ms No.31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated. 01-05-2023 as an illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, whimsical' nonapplication of mind, unlawful, u nconstitutional and in violation of Principles of Natural justice and in violation of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the constitution of lndia and also against the catena of judgments of this Hon'ble Court and an Apex Court and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 20l 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1) dated 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.|) DEPARTMENT, dated26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-4/51/A3/HRM-l/2014, dated 26-02-20'16 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 with consequential benefits,

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dld. 12-05-2023 and to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2iSMSLl2ll 2022- ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated. 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.l) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-4/51/ A3/HRM-l/ 2014, dated.26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated. 01-05-2023 forthwith.

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 1 51 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till regularization of the services of the rer rn ursuance of the ro osal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CIE-EST2/SMSL/ 20/ 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated. 01-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-I/2014, dated. 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (1h) Department, dated. 01-05-2023 forthwith.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I

W.P.NO: 32580 OF 2023

Between:

S.UmaMaheswari, MA.(English), D/o. Babaiah, Aged about 37 years, Occ. Contract Lecturer in English, Presently Working at Govt., Polytechnic, Station Ghanpur.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principle Secretary to the Higher<br>Education(Technical Education), Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government of Telangana State, Hyderabad.
• 5. The Government Polytechnic, Rep by its Principal, Government Polytechnic, Station Ghanpur, Jangaon.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non-regularizing the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings File No.CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 20/ 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2C1E-Part (1) dated. 01/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/A3/HRM-I/2014, dated 26/02/016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.NIs No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01/05/2023 as an illegal,

arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, unfarr, unreasonable, whimsical, non-application of mind, unlawful, unconstitutiona I and in violation of Principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,16 and 2'1 of the Constitution of lndia and also against the catena of judgments of this Honourable Court and an Apex Court and setaside the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceedings File No CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 2Ol 2022-ESf ABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1) dated n1-08-2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.|) DEPARTMENT, dated 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308- A/5'1lA3/HRM-ll2O14, daled 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01-05-2023 with consequential benefits.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dtd. 12-05-2023 and to regularize the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CIE-EST2/SMSL/ 2012022-ESr ABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1 ), dated. 01 -08- 2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM,1) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308- Ais1lA3/HRM-,,12014, dated. 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated. 01 -05-2023 forthwith.

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till regularization of the services of the petitioner as English Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2d respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2iSMSL/2OI

G.O.Ms. No. 16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated. 26-02-2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308-A/51/ A3/HRM4/2014, dated. 26-02-2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated. 01-05-2023 forthwith.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES-I

W.P.NO: 32862 OF 2023

Between:

M Venkanna, M.Sc(Mathematics), B.Ed, S/o. M.Yellaiah, Aged about 38 years, Occ: Contract Lecturer in Mathematics, Presently Working at Govt., Polytechnic, Nizamabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad The State of Telangana, Rep by its Principal Secretary to the Higher
• Education( Technical Education), Dr. B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad.
• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education. Government of Telangana State.
• 5. The Government Polytechnic, Rep by its Principal, Government Polytechnic, Nizamabad.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in non- regularizing the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proceedings sent by the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide proceedings File No.CTE-EST2/SMSL/ 20/ 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part (1), dated, 01/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms. No.16, FINANCE (HRM.I) DEPARTMENT, dated 26/02/2016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308- A/51/A3/HRM-1/2014, dated 26/02/2016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No.31, Higher Education (TE) Department, dated, 01/05/2023 as an illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory, unjust, unfair, unreasonable, whimsical, non-application of mind, unlawful, unconstitutional and in violation of

principles of Natural Justice and in violation of Article 14,'16 and 21 of the Constitution of lndia and also against the catena of judgments of this Honourable court and an Apex Court and set-asrde the same and consequently, direct the respondents to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the 3rd respondent sent proposal to the 2nd respondent, vide proceed ings File No. CTE-EST2/SM SLl20 12022-ESTAB L I b H M E NT-2CTE-Part( 1 ) dated, 0'l/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O.Ms No '16, FINANCE (HRM I) DEPARTMENT, dated, 26t02t2o16 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308 -A/ 51i A3/HRM-1 t2014, daled, 2610212016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.O.Ms No 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated 01/05/2023 with consequential benefits.

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

Petition under section '151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, dld:1210512023 and to regularize the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 20l 2022-ESTABLISHMENT-2CTE-Part(1), dated, 0'1/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O Ms. No. 16' FINANCE (HRM.1) DEPARTMENT, dated, 2610212016 and issued guide lines vide circular Memo No. 308- A/51/A3iHRM-l/2014, daled, 261O212016 on par at par similar situated persons regularized the services vide G.o.Ms No 31, Higher. Education (TE) Department dated, 0110512023 forthwith.

IANO:2OF 2023

Petition under section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner till regularization of, the services of the petitioner as Mathematics Lecturer in pursuance of the proposal sent the 3rd respondent to the 2nd respondent vide Proceedings File No. CTE-EST2/ SMSL/ 2Ot 2O22-ESI ABLISHMENT-2CTE-ParI(1), dated 0'1/08/2023 in pursuance of the G.O,Ms. No.16, FINANCE (HRM I) DEPARTMENT, dated, 26102t2O16 and issued

guidelinesvidecircularMemoNo'308-A7511A3/HRM-|/2014,dated,2610212016 onparatparsimilarsituatedpersonsregularizedtheServicesvideG.o'MsNo. 31, Higher Education (TE) Department dated, 0110512023 forthwith'

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES ^I

The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRT JUSTICE PULLA KARTHTK

WRIT PETITION Nos.32497 325L9 32576 32580 and,32862 of2O23

COMMON ORDER:

Since the issue raised in all these writ petitions is one and the same, they are taken up for hearing together and being disposed of by this common order.

2. Heard Sri Chikkudu Prabhakar, learned counsel for the petitioners, and the learned Government Pleader for Services_I for the respondents.

3. l,earned cotrnsel for the petitioner submits that all the petitioners are Post Graduates in concerned subjects and have participated in an interview conducted by the Expert Committee of the respondent and thereafter they were appointed as Junior Lecturer in their respective subjects, on 02.og.2011, 05. 11.201r, 22.O7.2013, 02.og.20Il and O2.O9.2OI1 respectively, against the sanctioned posts, by following Rule of Reservation in the respondent Department and since then the petitioners are discharging their duties till date. Learned counsel has further submitted that the State of

PI(, J WP 32497 2023 & batch

I 1 I

Telangana has taken up a policy for regularization of services of the contract employees urde G.O.Ms.No.16, Finance (HRM) Department, dated 26.02.2016, duly amending Telangana Public Employment (Regularization of Appointments to Public Services and Rationalization of Staff Pattern and Puy Structure), Act, 1994 and issued guidelines for regularization of contract employees. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioners have fulfilled all the conditions and guidelines enumerated in G.O.Ms.No.16, dated 26.02.2016 and therefore entitled for regularization. It is further submitted that based on the oral representations of the petitioners, the third respondent has also recommended the case of the petitioners to the second respondent by way of sending proposal for regularization of services of 15 left over contract lecturers working in Government Polytechnic Colleges and the sarne are pending consideration before the second respondent. Therefore, the learned counsel prayed this Court to direct the second respondent to pass appropriate orders on the recommendation made by respondent No.3.

2

$4.$ The learned Government Pleader for Services-I has submitted that necessary orders will be passed by respondent No.2, pursuant to the recommendations made by respondent No.3, in accordance with law.

5. In view of the submissions made by the respective counsel and without going into the merits of the case, these Writ Petitions are disposed of directing respondent No.2 to pass appropriate orders, pursuant to the proposal sent by respondent No.3 vide letter dated 01.08.2023, in accordance with law, within a period of eight (08) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

SD/-A.V.S. PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

1. The Principal Secretary to the Finance Department, Dr.B.R.Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

To

2. The Principal Secretary to the Higher Education (Technical Education), Department, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Secretariat, Saifabad, Hyderabad, State of Telangana.

• 3. The Commissioner, Technical Education Department, State of Telangana, Nampally, Hyderabad.
• 4. The Regional Joint Director, Department of Technical Education, Government of Telangana State.
• 5. The Principal, Government Polytechnic for Women, Govt. Polytechnic Maheshwaram, Ranga Reddy District.

$\mathbf{3}$

• 6 The Principal, Government Model Residential Polytechnic(GMRP), Model Residential Polytechnic (GMRP) at Manuguru, Badradri Kothegudem District. The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Government Polytechnic,
• KothegudemDistrict, BadradriKothegudem, T.S.
• 8. The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Government Polytechnic, Station Ghanpur, Jangaon.
• 9. The Principal, Government Polytechnic, Government Polytechnic, Nizamabad.
• 10. One CC to SRI PRABHAKAR CHIKKUDU, Advocate [OPUC]
• 11. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES-I, High Court for the State of Telangana, at Hyderabad. [OUT]
• 12. Two CD Copies

PSK.

$\mathsf{BS}_{\text{SVM}}$

HIGH COURT

DATED:21/12/2023

COMMON ORDER

WP.Nos.32497, 32519, 32576, 32580 AND 32862 of 2023

DISPOSING OF THE WRIT PETITIONS WITHOUT COSTS.