$[3219]$

$\sim 2.5$

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE T.MADHAVI DEVI

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2275 OF 2023

Contempt Case under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 to to punish the respondents herein for willfully and deliberately failing to implement the orders of the Hon'ble Court dated 15-6-2023 in W.P.No. 14506 of 2023.

Between:

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}) \times \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L}) \times \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{L})$

$\mathcal{L}_{\text{max}}$

Ch. Narsimulu, S/o Yellaiah, aged about 39 years, R/o H.No. 10-4-79, Nasar Pura, Siddipet Mandal, Siddipet District.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. K. Uma Devi, Chief General Manger (HRD), Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Corporate Office, Hyderabad.
• Superintending Engineer (Operation Circle), G.Mahesh Kumar, 2. $Sri$ Sangareddy, Sangareddy District.
• 3. Sri G.Raghuma Reddy, Chairman and Managing Director, Telangana State Southern Power Distribution Company Limited, Hyderabad.

RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS

IA NO: 2 OF 2023

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with appearance of the Respondent No.2 in CC No. 2275 of 2023.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P NARASIMHA

Counsel for the Respondents: Ms K UDAYA SRI

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE T. MADHAVI DEVI

CONTEMPT CASE No.2275 OF 2or23

ORDER:

\

The 2"a respondent is present.

2. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that this Court vide order dated 15.06.2023 had only suspended the impugned order issued to the petitioner vide letter dated 19.06.2O2O and no consequential benefrts were given to the pettioner.

3. l,earned counsel for the petitioner is also heard.

4. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner requested to consider his experience certificate, but the same was rejected by the respondents and the interim order was only suspending the order of rejection and not the direction to consider the petitioner's experience certificate, there is no willful disobedience of the orders of this Court, therefore, the petitioner is directed to pursue the writ petition.

$5.$ In view of the above, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.

Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall also stand

Sd/- B. SATYAVATHI DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

closed.

//TRUE COPY//

To

• K. Uma Devi, Chief General Manger (HRD), Telangana State Southern Power<br>Distribution Company Limited, Corporate Office, Hyderabad. Sri G.Mahesh Kumar, Superintending Engineer (Operation Circle),<br>S

• 6. Two CD Copies

$\mathbf{P}\mathbf{R}$

ORDER

CC.No.2275 of 2023

CLOSING THE CC