State Of Telangana Rep By The Principal Secretary Revenue Department Secretariat Hyderabad vs. Smt G Neeraja

Final Order

Court:High Court of Haryana and Punjab

Judge:Hon'ble Sujoy Paul

Case Status:Disposed

Order Date:15 Apr 2025

CNR:HBHC010516002024

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Get a certified copy of this order

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA : HYDERABAD

SL.<br>NO	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE<br><b>NOTE</b>
07.	15.04.2025	HACJ $(SP,J)$ & RY,J	Transferred to
		I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1371 of 2024;	IO Folder<br>before
		I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1348 of 2024;	corrections.
		I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1350 of 2024;
		I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1355 of 2024;<br>I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1356 of 2024
		and
		I.A.No.1 of 2024 in W.A.No.1372 of 2024
		Sri Pottigari Sridhar Reddy, learned
		Special Government Pleader attached to the
		office of the learned Advocate General, for the
		appellants; Sri K.V.Bhanu Prasad, learned
		Senior Counsel appearing for Sri Kothapalli
		Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the
		respondents in W.A.Nos.1371, 1348, 1350 and
		1372 of 2024; Sri K.Ravi Kumar, learned
		counsel appearing for Sri S.V.Ramana, learned
		counsel for respondents in W.A.No.1355 of
		2024 and Sri S.Srinivas Reddy, learned Senior
		Counsel for the respondent in W.A.No.1356 of
		2024.
		These applications seeking condonation
		of delay in filing the appeals are taken up.
		Although there exists a delay and formal
		objections are also raised by the other side,
		the fact remains that the learned Special
		Government Pleader attached to the office of

SL.<br>NO	DATE	<b>ORDER</b>	OFFICE<br><b>NOTE</b>
		the learned Advocate General appearing for the
		appellants, at the outset, submitted that the
		State is not challenging the impugned orders
		of the learned Single Judge on merits.<br>The
		only clarification prayed for is that while not
		disturbing the impugned orders herein, it may
		be clarified that the relief so granted by the
		learned Single Judge shall be confined to the
		extent of land which is claimed for in the relief
		clause of the writ petitions.
		The other side has no objection.
		In this peculiar factual backdrop, these
		interlocutory applications are disposed of.
		HACJ $(SP,J)$
		RY,J
		WRIT APPEAL NOS. 1371, 1348,<br>1350, 1355, 1356 and 1372 of<br>2024
		The writ appeals are disposed of.
		(vide separated common judgment)
		b/o.<br>sa/vs