(sHow cAUSE NOTTCE BEFORE ADM|SS|ON) HIqH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE P.MADHAVI DEVI

WRIT PETITION NO: 28129 OF 2022

Between;

Y. Srinivas, S/o. Satyanarayana 1.

I\4. Narsing, S/o Biksham Singh, 2.

D. Shekar, S/o. Badraiah, 3.

B. Said u lu, S/o. Narasiah, 4.

Y. Ravi, S/o. Satyanarayanam, 5.

M..{nil, S/o. Laxmaiah, tr.

Ch. Giri Babu, S/o. Ramanarsaiah, 7.

K. Nagaiah, S/o. Linhaiah, B.

It/. Anil, S/o. Bixgiri Singh, 9.

V. Satyamunhy, S/o. Yadagiri, 10

G. Karnakar, S/o. Dharmaiah, 11

12.G Balaraj, S/o. Balamallaiah,

13. S. Srinivas, S/o Bixapathi,

14. B. Srinivas, S/o. Yellaiah,

15. Bangamatla Srinivas, S/o, Laxmaiah,

l6.lVukkala Naresh, S/o. Nagesh,

17. Ja ugavelli Anjaneyulu, S/o. Muthaiah,

18. G. Bala Durgesh, S/o Balamallaiah,

19.G. Heeralal, S/O Dharma,

20. L. Renuka, D/o. Somaiah,

21.T. Satyanarayana, S/o. Ramanarsaiah,

22. Ch,. Sayanna, S/o. Saidich,

23 D. Yadagiri, S/o. Badraiah,

24. N. Nagaraju, Sio Somaiah,

25. D. Anandharn, S/o. Pitchaiah,

26. S. Lalamrna, Wo N/allesh,

27. G. Nageshwar, D/o. Venkatramulu,

28.N. Kishan Rao. S/o tr/allaiah,

29. A. Krishna. S/o Anjaiah.

30. R. Shanker, S/o. Guruvaiah,

31. N. Anlaneyulu, S/o. Mallaiah,

32. N. Ram Narsaiah, S/o. Venkaiah,

33. N Anil, S/o [Varaiah,

34.IV. Sailander, S/o. Bixmaiah,

35. B. Anjaiah, S/o. Laxmaiah,

36.G. Gangadhar, S/o. Dharmaiah,

...Petitioners

• 1. National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, rep by its Chairman, Office at: C24 Bandrakurla Complex Bandra East Mumbai – 400051.
• 2. Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By State Bank of India) Rep by its Chairman, Warangal, Telangana State.
• State Bank of India, rep by its Chairman, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai.

...Respondents

WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through their Advocate M/s. AVADESH NARAYANA SANGHI presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of the respondent insisting the Writ Petitioners to sign on the contract form for continuance in service as wholly illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and voilative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to continue the petitioners on the same terms and conditions and to regularize their services as per the scheme to be formulated by the respondent bank service in the interest of justice.

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of M/s. AVADESH NARAYANA SANGHI, Advocate for the Petitioner, directed issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this writ petition should not be admitted in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed in Writ Petition;

You viz:

• The Chairman, National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, Office at: C24 Bandrakurla Complex Bandra East Mumbai – 400051.
• The Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By State Bank of India) Warangal, Telangana State.
• The Chairman, State Bank of India, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai.

are directed to show cause on or before 11.07.2022 to which date the case stands posted as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the affidavit filed therewith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted.

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the services of the Writ Petitioners since they are working for several years without insisting them to sign on a contract form, pending disposal of Writ Petition No.28129 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING ORDER:

"Notice before admission.

• او او

Ms.Uma Devi, Learned counsel, takes notice on behalf of the respondent No.2.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to take out personal notice on respondent Nos.1 to 3.

The I.A.No.1 of 2022 is filed seeking continuation of services without insisting them to sign on the contract form.

Learned counsel for the respondent No.2 seeks time to get instructions in I.A.No.01 of 2022.

List on 11.07.2022 in 'motion list'.

However, the petitioners shall be continued in service till then."

SD/- R. KARTHIKEYAN ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

Τo,

• 1. The Chairman, National Bank of Agriculture and Rural Development, Office at: C24 Bandrakurla Complex Bandra East Mumbai 400051.
• 2. The Chairman, Andhra Pradesh Grameena Vikas Bank, (Sponsored By State Bank of India) Warangal, Telangana State.
• 3. The Chairman, State Bank of India, Vidhan Bhavan Marg, Nariman Point, Mumbai (RR 1 to 3 by RPAD along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
• 4. One CC to M/s. AVADESH NARAYAN SANGHI, Advocate [OPUC].
• 5. One spare copy.

نى با

1. X

'ر

HIGH COURT

PMDJ

DATED: 05/07/2022

et d

. محمو ا

LIST ON 11.07.2022 IN MOTION LIST

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

WP.No.28129 of 2022

ن محمو ب<del>ن</del>

نموي:

DIRECTION