[ 32e61

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JANUARY ' T'ruO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V' BHASKAR REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE NO: ⁷⁷³0F 2020

Contempt Case under Section 10 lo 12 of Contempt of Courts Act' 1 971 to punish the Respondent herein for willfully violating and disobeying the orders of this Court dated lOtO1l2O2O passed in W P No 866 of 2020'

'"!'""nT"o,, s.le,l1,^R3g;dJi"i,&5tgfr),:BJffl,T35&?,Y3#'&?"" 44 vears' R/o PatighanPur Village, Pat

..PETITIONER

AND

Shri N Mahipal, Tahsildar, Patancheru ttilandal' Sanga Reddy District'

... RESPONDENT

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI K V SUDHAKAR REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent : AGP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY

CONTEMPT CASE No.773 of 2020

ORDER:

This Contempt Case is filed alleging non-compliance of the order, dated 10.01.2020 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.866 of 2020.

This Court vide order dated 10.01.2020 disposed of the writ $\overline{2}$ . petition granting liberty to the petitioner to make an application on the file of respondent No.4 therein/respondent herein and cn making such application the respondent herein was directed to consider the same and take a stion in accordance with law, within a period of two weeks from thereon.

3. After receipt of the notice in this Contempt Case, the respondent has fled counter affidavit, wherein in Para 4 it is stated that in compliance with the orders of this Court, the respondent has conducted survey of land in Sy.No.347 of Nandigama Village and prepared panchapama and location sketch in the presence of petitioner and patuadars. It is further stated that the petitioner with a malafide intention disputing the possession, extent and boundaries mentioned in the location map and without taking recourse to recover the possession of excess land alleged to have been in

possession of adjacent pattadars has made false allegation that the respondent has not shown and hxed boundaries as per the extent claimed by him. It is further stated that in fact, the petitioner instituted a suit vide O.S.No.374 of 2015 on the frle of Senior Civii Judge, Sangareddy, seeking perpetual injunction against the adjacent pattadars in respect of very same subject land and suppressing the same, he has instituted the writ petition and relying on the orders of this Court he is insisting the respondents to fix boundaries of the land in occupation of third parties.

4. In view of the above submission, this Court is of the view that there is no willful or deliberate intention on the part of the respondent to initiate proceedings under the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 197 l.

5. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs

Sd/- M. RAMANA KRISHNA DEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

,1 .r ^r b,(d,Ut-- ( \ vt SECTION OFFICER

To

I I I I

• 1. One CC to SRI K V SUDHAKAR REDDY, Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE, High Court for the State of Telangana at Hyderabad [OUT]
• 3. Two CD Copies

ADK,iDL

2

HIGH COURT

DATED:10/01/2025

ORDER

CC.No.773 of 2020

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS