$[3296]$

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. BHASKAR REDDY

WRIT PETITION NO: 6651 OF 2015

Between:

Sayeeda Bee, W/o Late Shaikh Mahboob, Aged about 75 years, Occ Housewife, R/o H.No.5-6-277/16, Nampally, Gosha Mahal, Hyderabad.

...PETITIONER

AND

The Regional Passport Officer, Having Office at Clock Towers, Near Prashat Talkies, Secunderabad.

...RESPONDENT

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent herein in not correcting petitioners date of birth as 19-5-1939 in her passport with that of existing date of birth as 19-05-1955 and not renewing passport as illegal and arbitrary against the principles of natural justice

WPMP. NO: 8852 OF 2015

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent to take steps in correcting petitioner's date of birth as 19-5-1939 in her passport bearing No.L-6526913 by renewing her passport, pending disposal of this Writ petition

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KHAJA MOINUDDIN

Counsel for the Respondent: Ms. N.V.R.RAJYA LAKSHMI REP. FOR SRI GADI PRAVEEN KUMAR. DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

The Court made the following: ORDER

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.6651 of 2015

ORDER:

\ \

This Writ Petition has been filed praying this Court to declare the action of the respondent ., in not correcting the petitioner's date ol birth as 19.05.1939 in her passport in the existing date of birth as 19.05.1955 and not renewing her passport AS illegal and arbitrary and for other consequential reliefs.

Ms.N.V.R.Rajya Lakshmi, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appearing for the respondent, submits that basing on the material documents available on the application submitted by the petitioner, her case has been considered and as the petitioner has not produced any documents to the satisfaction of the respondent the file has been closed on 25.O9.2017, therefore, the cause in this writ petition ¹⁵nO longer survives for further adjudication. I

Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

As a sequel, the miscellaneous petitions pending, if

any, shall stard closed.

SD/-N. SRIHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY'

SECTION OFFICER

To,

• 1. One CC to Sri Khaia tVloinuddin, Advocate TOPUC]
• i o;; cC to sri Gad-i Praveen Kumar' Deputy Solicitor General of
• lndia, [OPUCI
• 3. Two CD CoPies

Plp GJP-€k'

\ \

HIGH COURT DATED: 26/07/2024

ORDER

WP.No.6651 of 2015

DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS INFRUCTUOUS.