The State Of Telangana And 2 Others vs. Mrs. Neelima Lele And 2 Others
Court:High Court of Haryana and Punjab
Judge:Hon'ble J Sreenivas Rao
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Mar 2023
CNR:HBHC010140272023
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble N.Tukaramji , Ujjal Bhuyan
Listed On:
20 Mar 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
MAIN CASE No:
W.A.No.355 of 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
Sl. | Date | ORDER | OFFICE<br>NOTE |
---|---|---|---|
No.<br>1. | 20.03.2023 | HCJ & NTRJ | |
I.A.No.1 of 2023 | Transferred to<br>i/o folder,<br>before<br>corrections, if<br>any. | ||
Heard<br>Mr.<br>Parsa<br>Ananth<br>Nageswar<br>Rao, | |||
learned Government Pleader attached to the office of | |||
learned Advocate General for the appellants and | |||
Mr.<br>Rajendra<br>Kumar,<br>learned<br>counsel<br>for | |||
respondents No.1 and 2. | |||
This interlocutory application has been filed | |||
for condoning the delay of 203 days in filing the | |||
related appeal against the order dated 13.04.2022 | |||
passed<br>by<br>the<br>learned<br>Single<br>Judge<br>in | |||
W.P.No.12798 of 2021. | |||
We have perused the supporting affidavit. | |||
In paragraph 18 of the said affidavit it is | |||
stated as follows: | |||
It is respectfully submitted that the | |||
copy of the judgment in the writ petition | |||
was received in the office of the District | |||
Collector,<br>Ranga<br>Reddy<br>District,<br>on |
27.07.2022 and in the office of Special | |
---|---|
Deputy<br>Collector,<br>Urban<br>Land<br>Ceiling, | |
Ranga Reddy District on 16.08.2022. The | |
delay is neither deliberate nor intentional | |
but only due to the aforesaid reasons and I | |
have been advised that this Court has | |
ample powers of condone delay. If the said | |
delay were to be condoned it would not | |
cause any loss or prejudice to the other | |
side but would only enable the matter to | |
be heard and decided on merit.<br>Hence is | |
this application seeking condonation of | |
delay in filing the above appeal. | |
We are of the view that the above averments | |
are wholly inadequate to justify the inordinate delay | |
of 203 days. | |
However, we grant liberty to the appellants to | |
file a better affidavit to explain the delay. | |
List again on 03.04.2023. | |
_________<br>HCJ | |
_________ | |
NTRJ | |
vs |
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search