Lakshmidevamma vs. State Of Telangana
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble G.Anupama Chakravarthy
Listed On:
17 Mar 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA: HYDERABAD
MAIN CASE No.: Crl.R.C.No.188 of 2023
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl. | OFFIC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| No | DATE | ORDER | E |
| NOTE<br>Transferre | |||
| 01 | 17-03-2023 | GAC,J | d to I.O. |
| Crl.R.C.No.188 of 2023 | folder<br>before | ||
| Admit. | making | ||
| Call for the record. | correction<br>s | ||
| List on 06.06.2023. | |||
| I.A.No.01 of 2023 | |||
| This<br>application<br>is<br>filed<br>seeking<br>suspension<br>of | |||
| sentence passed in Crl.A.No.692 of 2015, dated 30.11.2022 | |||
| by the learned III Special Judge for Trial of Cases under | |||
| Essential Commodities Act-cum-III Additional Metropolitan | |||
| Sessions Judge, Hyderabad, confirming the judgment of | |||
| learned<br>Chief<br>Metropolitan<br>Magistrate,<br>Hyderabad<br>in | |||
| C.C.No.117<br>of<br>2003,<br>dated<br>30.07.2015<br>whereby,<br>the | |||
| petitioner/accused was convicted under Section 248(2) of | |||
| Cr.P.C. for the offences under Sections 471 and 474 of I.P.C | |||
| and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 2 (two) | |||
| years for each of the offences under Sections 471 and 474 of | |||
| I.P.C and to pay a fine of Rs.1000/- each for the offences | |||
| under Sections 471 and 474 of I.P.C, in default, to undergo | |||
| simple imprisonment for three months. | |||
| The<br>petitioner/accused<br>aggrieved<br>by<br>the<br>said | |||
| judgment, this Criminal Revision Case. | |||
| Heard learned counsel for the petitioner/accused as | |||
| well as the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for | |||
| Contd |
respondent No.1/State and perused the record including the judgments of the trial Court and the appellate Court, and the grounds of criminal revision.
Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is of the considered view that this is a fit case for suspension of sentence alone.
In the result, the sentence alone imposed by the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad in C.C.No.117 of 2003, dated 30.07.2015, against Accused, as confirmed by the learned III Special Judge for Trial of Cases under Essential Commodities Act-cum-III Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Hyderabad in Crl.A.No.692 of 2015, dated 30.11.2022, is hereby suspended.
Further, Accused is directed to surrender before the trial Court on or before 31.03.2023 and on such surrender, she shall be enlarged on bail on executing personal bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) and two sureties for a like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Hyderabad,
_______
GAC,J
Smk