eCourtsIndia

R. Kamala Bai vs. The State Of Telangana

Court:Punjab & Haryana, Special (High Court)
Judge:Hon'ble M.Laxman
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:2 Apr 2019
CNR:HBHC010054432019

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Specially Mentioned Cases(Court Slips)

Before:

Hon'ble Shameem Akther

Listed On:

2 Apr 2019

Order Text

(FRESH SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD TUESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL, TWO THOUSAND AND NINETEEN

:PRESENT:

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER >

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 831 OF 2019

Between:

R.Kamala Bai @ Kamala Devi W/o. Late Ashok Kumar

Petitioner/Accused No2

    1. The state of Telangana, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court, Hyderabad. <
    1. C.V. Pavani Priya, W/o. Ajay Kumar, R/o.H.No. 3-5-4, Lalbazar, Thirumalgherry, Secunderabad.

AND

Respondents/Complainant

WHEREAS the petitioner above named through her Advocate Smt. Annapurna Sreeram, presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the proceedings in C.C.No.246 of 2017 on the file of XV Metropolitan Magistrate at Hyderabad for the alleged offence U/Sec. 498-A of I.P.C. in so far as the Petitioner/Accused No.2 is concerned: $\checkmark$

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and memorandum of grounds filed herein, and upon hearing the arguments of Smt. Annapurna Sreeram, Advocate for the Petitioner, and of the Public Prosecutor for the Respondent No.1 herein, directed to issue of fresh notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause why this petition should not be admitted;

You viz;

C.V. Pavani Priya, W/o. Ajay Kumar, R/o.H.No. 3-5-4, Lalbazar, Thirumalgherry, Secunderabad.

are directed to show cause as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted. $\angle$

The Court made the following: ORDER

"Heard. Perused the record.

Issue fresh notice to respondent No.2 to the correct address.

Learned counsel for the petitioner/accused No.2 is also permitted to take out personal notice to respondent No.2 by registered post with acknowledgment due and file proof of service in the Registry.

Post after two (02) weeks."

SD/- M.RAMANA KRISHNA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

    1. C.V. Pavani Priya, W/o. Ajay Kumar, R/o.H.No. 3-5-4, Lalbazar, Thirumalgherry, Secunderabad. (by RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds)
    1. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad $(OUT)$ $\overline{ }$
    1. One CC to Smt. Annapurna Sreeram, Advocate [OPUC]
    1. One spare copy $\angle$

To,

DATE: 02-04-2019

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CRL.P. NO. 831 OF 2019

$\mathbf{v}$

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 5 Jul 2023

Final Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 2 Apr 2019

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(1) - 14 Feb 2019

Interim Order

Click to view