The State Of Ap And 3 Others vs. Smti Yabi Mindo And 6 Ors.

Final Order
Court:High Court of Gauhati at Itanagar Bench
Judge:Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Kakheto Sema
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:5 Feb 2024
CNR:GAHC040015502023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Kakheto Sema , Honourable Mrs. Justice Malasri Nandi

Listed On:

5 Feb 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

Page No.# 1/4

GAHC040015502023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : IA(C)/194/2023

The State of AP and 3 Others REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER/SECRETARY, PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP, CIVL SECRETARIAT, ITANAGAR.

2: THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER Age: Occupation : COORDINATION PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR.

3: THE CHIEF ENGINEER Age: Occupation : EASTERN ZONE PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR.

4: THE CHIEF ENGINEER Age: Occupation : PHE AND WESTERN ZONE SENKI PARK ITANAGAR AP

VERSUS

Smti Yabi Mindo and 6 Ors. D/O LT. TABA MINDO, PERAMENT RESIDENT OF VILL. POYOM, PO/PS DARAK, WEST SIANG DISTRICT, AP.

2:DUBI BAGRA Age: 43 Occupation : W/O SHRI SHRI TATE RINA P/R/O VILLAGE MANE PO/PS KORANG EAST SIANG DIST. AP.

3:OBUR RIRAM Age: 39 Occupation : D/O SHRI TANYA RIRAM PO BILAT EAST SIANG DISTRICT A P.

4:NAGAMI BOGO Age: 43 Occupation : W/O SHRI KARRE POTOM R/O VILLAGE BOGO PO DARAK PS KAMBA WEST SIANG DIST. AP.

5:ATING TAMUK Age: 36 Occupation : W/O KALING PANGU P/R/O VILLAGE BOGNE PO/PS KAYING SIANG DIST. AP.

6:NABAM YASSO Age: 37 Occupation : W/O SHRI TOKO SAKHA P/R/O VILLAGE LANGHER PO/PS SAGALEE PAPUM PARE DIST. AP.

7:MUDANG YANYUNG Age: 32 Occupation : W/O HIBU TADII P/R/O VILLAGE HONG PO/PS ZIRO LOWER SUBANSIRI DIST. AP

Advocate for the Petitioner : Subu Tapin

Advocate for the Respondent :

Linked Case : WA/36/2023

The State of AP and 3 Others Age: 0 Occupation : Address:REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP CIVL SECRETARIAT ITANAGAR.

2: THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : Address:COORDINATION PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR.

3: THE CHIEF ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : Address:EASTERN ZONE PHE AND WS DEPARTMENT GOVT. OF AP ITANAGAR.

4: THE CHIEF ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : Address:PHE AND WESTERN ZONE SENKI PARK ITANAGAR AP.

VERSUS

Smti Yabi Mindo and 6 Ors. Age: 0 Occupation : Address:D/O LT. TABA MINDO PERAMENT RESIDENT OF VILL. POYOM PO/PS DARAK WEST SIANG DISTRICT AP.

2:DUBI BAGRA Age: 43 Occupation : Address:W/O SHRI SHRI TATE RINA P/R/O VILLAGE MANE PO/PS KORANG EAST SIANG DIST. AP.

3:OBUR RIRAM Age: 39 Occupation : Address:D/O SHRI TANYA RIRAM PO BILAT EAST SIANG DISTRICT A P.

4:NAGAMI BOGO Age: 43 Occupation : Address:W/O SHRI KARRE POTOM R/O VILLAGE BOGO PO DARAK PS KAMBA WEST SIANG DIST. AP.

5:ATING TAMUK Age: 36 Occupation : Address:W/O KALING PANGU P/R/O VILLAGE BOGNE PO/PS KAYING SIANG DIST. AP.

6:NABAM YASSO Age: 37 Occupation : Address:W/O SHRI TOKO SAKHA P/R/O VILLAGE LANGHER PO/PS SAGALEE PAPUM PARE DIST. AP.

7:MUDANG YANYUNG Age: 32 Occupation : Address:W/O HIBU TADII P/R/O VILLAGE HONG PO/PS ZIRO LOWER SUBANSIRI DIST. AP. ------------

Advocate for : Subu Tapin Advocate for :

appearing for Smti Yabi Mindo and 6 Ors.: Advocate , , , , , , appearing for 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, respectively

BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE KAKHETO SEMA HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MALASRI NANDI

ORDER

Date : 05-02-2024 (Kakheto Sema, J)

Heard Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate for the applicants. Also heard Ms. N. Anju, learned counsel appearing for all the respondents.

This application has been filed under Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, for condoning the delay of 67 days in filing the connected appeal.

The grounds explaining the delay is set out in paragraph no. 2 & 3 of the application.

We have perused the paragraph no. 2 & 3 and we are satisfied that the applicant has been able to satisfactorily explain the delay of 67 days.

Prayer for condonation of delay of 67 days in filing the connected appeal is accordingly allowed.

Page No.# 4/4

The interlocutory application stands disposed of.

JUDGE JUDGE

Comparing Assistant