Dakpe Sipi vs. The State Of Ap And 6 Others
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Nelson Sailo
Listed On:
10 Mar 2025
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
GAHC040015362023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : WP(C)/532/2023
Dakpe Sipi
S/O LATE TASHI DAKPE, P/R/O DAKPE VILLAGE, P.O. AND P.S.-RAGA, DIST KAMLE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH, PIN-791120, P/R/A PAPU NALLAH, P.O.- NAHARLAGUN, P.S.-PAPU HILLS, NAHARLAGUN, DIST-PAPUM PARE, ARUNACHAL PRADESH-791110
VERSUS
The State of AP and 6 Others REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION), GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, ITANAGAR, PIN-791111 2:THE COMMISSIONER (EDUCATION) Age: 0 Occupation : GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH CIVIL SECRETARIAT ITANAGAR PIN-791111
3:THE SECRETARY (EDUCATION) Age: 0 Occupation : GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH CIVIL SECRETARIAT ITANAGAR PIN-791111
4:THE DIRECTOR Age: 0 Occupation : STATE COUNCIL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH AND TRAINING (SCERT) GOVERNMENT OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH GOHPUR TINALI
ITANAGAR PIN-791111
5:THE PRINCIPAL Age: 0 Occupation : DISTRICT INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING (DIET) PAPU NALLAH NAHARLAGUN PIN-791110
6:THE PRINCIPAL Age: 0 Occupation : DISTRICT INSITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING (DIET) DAPORIJO DIST-UPPER SUBANSIRI ARUNACHAL PRADESH PIN-791122
7:MUKESH KUMAR SINGH Age: 0 Occupation : ACCOUNTANT DISTRICT INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION AND TRAINING (DIET) DAPORIJO DIST-UPPER SUBANSIRI ARUNACHAL PRADESH PIN-7911
Advocate for the Petitioner : Parswajyoti Das Nair, Signal Yirang,Tabung Nonang,T Gamlin,William Yirang,A Perme,Wintet Sawin,Krishna Dubey,Lissing Perme,G Alam
Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC (Education),Tagum Jamoh,Taba Tagum
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
ORDER
Date : 10.03.2025
Mr. T. Tagum, learned Standing Counsel for the Education Department is said to have left the Court premises on account of certain personal urgency and a prayer is made on his behalf for adjournment.
As Mr. P. D. Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner has no objection to the prayer, the matter stands adjourned for 2(two) weeks.
List the matter again after two weeks, as prayed for.
Interim order passed earlier shall continue till the next date of listing.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant