Smti Ranu Bhattacharjee vs. The State Of Ap And 6 Others

Court:High Court of Gauhati at Itanagar Bench
Judge:Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Kalyan Rai Surana
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:11 Jun 2024
CNR:GAHC040015332023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Orders

Before:

Hon'ble Honourable Mrs. Justice Mitali Thakuria

Listed On:

11 Jun 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

GAHC040015332023

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)

Case No. : WP(C)/529/2023

Smti Ranu Bhattacharjee WIFE OF LATE BIMALENDU BHATTACHARJEE, RESIDENT OF BOGAPANI COLONY, P.O. BOGANPANI, P.S. DIGBOI, DIST.- TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN 786171

VERSUS

The State of AP and 6 Others REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH, BLOCK NO.II, 5TH FLOOR, STATE CAPITAL COMPLEX, ITANAGAR, ARUNACHAL PRADESH

2:THE SECRETARY POWER (ELECTRICAL DEPARTMENT) Age: 0 Occupation : TO THE GOVT. OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH BLOCK NO. III 3RD FLOOR STATE CAPITAL COMPLEX ITANAGAR ARUNACHAL PRADESH

3:THE DIRECTOR OF AUDIT AND PENSION Age: 0 Occupation : GOVT. OF ARUNACHAL PRADESH D SECTOR NAHARLAGUN ARUNACHAL PRADESH 791110

4:THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER Age: 0

Occupation : DEPARTMENT OF POWER ELECTRICAL DIVISION WEST SIANG DISTRICT AALO ARUNACHAL PRADESH 791001

5:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : DEPARTMENT OF POWER ELECTRICAL DIVISION WEST SIANG DISTRICT AALO ARUNACHAL PRADESH 791001

6:THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER Age: 0 Occupation : DEPARTMENT OF POWER ELECTRICAL DIVISION WEST SIANG DISTRICT AALO ARUNACHAL PRADESH 791001

7:THE TREASURY OFFICER Age: 0 Occupation : WEST SIANG DISTRICT AALO ARUNACHAL PRADESH 7910

Advocate for the Petitioner : D Tamuk

Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)

BEFORE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE MITALI THAKURIA

ORDER

Date : 11.06.2024

Heard Ms. D. Tamuk, learned Amicus Curiae representing the petitioner. Also heard Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate representing the State respondents.

It is submitted by Ms. D. Tamuk, learned Amicus Curiae that she needs some more time to file their affidavit-in-reply.

Prayer is allowed.

List it accordingly after 3(three) weeks enabling the learned Amicus Curiae to file affidavit-in-reply.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(9) - 11 Apr 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 24 Jan 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Sept 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 11 Jun 2024

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(5) - 10 Apr 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 27 Mar 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 13 Mar 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 8 Jan 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Dec 2023

Interim Order

Click to view