The Union Of India And 3 Ors. vs. Libo Ragmuk And 4 Ors.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Orders
Before:
Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Arun Dev Choudhury
Listed On:
3 Apr 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Page No.# 1/3
GAHC040004652023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : L.A.Appl. 2/2022
1:The Union of India and 3 Ors. Ministry of Defence
Represented by the Defence Secretary 101A South Block New Delhi 110011
2: The Director General of Defence Estates (DGDE) Raksha Sampada Bhawan Ulaan Baatar Marg Delhi Cantonment. PIN 110010
3: The Principal Director of Defence Estates. Eastern Command (PDDEEC) AC 4 4/1 Belveder Road Alipore Kolkata West Bengal. PIN 700027
4: The Defence Estate Officer (DEO) Itanagar Circle Dist. Papum Pare Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791110 VERSUS
1:Libo Ragmuk and 4 Ors. S/o Libo Ragmuk
R/o Vill. Talo
PO and PS Tato Dist. Shi Yomi Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791001
2:Eling Ragmuk S/o Late Tabin Ragmuk
R/o Vill Talo PO and PS Tato Dist. Shi Yomi Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791001
3:Raju Diru S/o Tachuk Diru
R/o Vill Talo PO and PS Tato Dist. Shi Yomi Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791001
4:Tajen Diru S/o Libu Diru
R/o Vill Talo PO and PS Tato Dist. Shi Yomi Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791001
5:The Collector cum Deputy Commissioner Shi Yomi District Tato Arunachal Pradesh. PIN 791001
Advocate for the Petitioner : 1 Y Doloi Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP)
BEFORE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
ORDER
Date : 03-04-2023
Heard Mr. Y. Doloi, learned senior panel counsel for the appellants-Union of India. Also heard Mr. B. Pathak, learned counsel, appearing on behalf of Respondents No. 1 to 4; and Mr. Yomi Riram, learned Government Advocate, appearing on behalf of Respondent No. 5.
In view of the order passed by the Court today in the connected interlocutory application, list it on 4th of May, 2023, along with other analogous matters.
Mr. Pathak, learned counsel for Respondents No. 1 to 4, in the meanwhile, has consented not to pursue the connected execution case till 4th of May, 2023.
JUDGE
Comparing Assistant