The Union Of India vs. Dorjee Khandu Chukla
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
17 Jun 2020
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
Page No.# 1/9
GAHC040003932020
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH)
Case No. : IA(C) 69/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE, REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY, 101A SOUTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI
2: DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE ESTATES RAKSHA SAMPADA BHAWAN ULAAN BAATAR MARG DELHI CANTT.
3: THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DEFENCE ESTATES (PDDE) EASTERN COMMAND 13 CAMAC STREET 7TH FLOOR KOLKATTA-17 WEST BENGAL
4: THE DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER (DEO) ITANAGAR DISTRICT PAPUM PARE AP
VERSUS
1:Dorjee Khandu Chukla age about 38 yrs. s/o Passang tsering,resident of chukla village, po/ps menchuka dist. shi donyi, ap.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : WA 12/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA Ministry of Defence represented by the Defence Secretary 101A South Block new Delhi
2: The Director General Defence Estates
Raksha Sampada Bhawan Ulaan Baatar Marg Delhi cant-
3: The Principal Director
Defence Estates Eastern Command 13 Camac Street 7th Floor Kolkata-17 West Bengal
4: The Defence Estates Officer
Itanagar District Papum Pare AP VERSUS
1:Dorjee Khandu Chukla aged about 38 Years son of Pasang Tsering resident of Chukla village PO/PS Menchuka District Shi Yomi AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent : B Pathak
Linked Case : IA(C) 68/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY 101A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI
2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE ESTATES RAKSHA SAMPADA BHAWAN ULAAN BAATAR MARG DELHI CANTT.
3: THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DEFENCE ESTATES (PDDE) EASTERN COMMAND 13 CAMAC STREET 7 TH FLOOR KOLKATA -17 WEST BENGAL.
4: THE DEFENCE ESTATE OFFICER (DEO) ITANAGAR DISTRICT PAPUM PARE AP VERSUS
1:Dorjee Khandu Chukla AGED ABOUT 38 YRS S/O PASANG TSERING RESIDENT OF CHUKLA VILLAGE PO/PS MENCHUKA DIST. SHI YOMI AP.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent :
Case No. : IA(C) 72/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA Ministry of Defence, represented by the Defence secretary, 101A South Block, New Delhi-
2: The Director General Defence Estates Raksha sampada bhawan Ulaan Baatar Marg
Delhi Cantt. 110010
3: The Principal Director Defence Estates
Eastern Command 13 Camac Street 7th Floor Kolkata West Bengal
4: The Defence Estates Officer
Itanagar district Papum Pare A
VERSUS
1:Thinley Sona aged about 77 Years, Son of Late Lhakpa Sona, resident of singbir village, PO/PS menchuka, Dist. Shi Yomi, AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : WA 11/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY 101 A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI-110011
2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE ESTATES( DGDE)
RAKSHA SAMPADA BHAWAN ULAAN BAATAR MARG DELHI CANTT. 110010
3: THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DEFENCE ESTATES( PDDE) EASTERN COMMAND
13 CAMAC STREET 7TH FLOOR KOLKATA-17 WEST BENGAL
4: THE DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER( DEO) ITANAGAR PAPUMPARE DISTT AP VERSUS
1:THINLEY SONA SON OF LATE LHAKPA SONA R/O SINGBIR VILLAGE PO/PS MENCHUKA SHI YOMI DISTT AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent : B Pathak
Linked Case : IA(C) 71/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY 101A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI
2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE ESTATES (DGDE) EASTERN COMMAND 13 CAMAC STREET 7TH FLOOR KOLKATA -17WEST BENGAL
3: THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DEFENCE ESTATES EASTERN COMMAND 13 CAMAC STREE 7TH FLOOR KOLKATA -17 WEST BENGAL
4: THE DEFENCE ESTATES OFFICER ITANAGAR DISTRICT PAPUM PARE AP VERSUS
1:Thinley Sona S/O LT. LHAKPA SONA RESIDENT OF SINGBIR VILLAGE PO/PS MENCHUKA DISTRICT SHI YOMI AP.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent :
Case No. : IA(C) 73/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA Ministry of Defence, represented by the Defence Secretary, 101A, South Block, New Delhi
2: The Director General Defence Estates
Raksha Sampada Bhawan Ulaan Baatar Marg Delhi Cantt. 110010
3: The Principal Director Defence Estates
Eastern Command 13 Camac Street 7th Floor Kolkata-17 West Bangal
4: The Defence Estates Officer
Itanagar District Papum Pare A
VERSUS
1:Libo Ragmuk Aged about 43 years, Son of Taduk Ragmuk, resident of Talo village, PO/PS Menchuka, District Shi Yomi, Arunachal Pradesh
2:Eling Ragmuk aged about 41 years sonof T. Ragmuk resident of Tato village PO/PS Menchuka shi Yomi District A
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan
Advocate for the Respondent :
Linked Case : WA 13/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA Ministry of Defence represented by the Defence Secretary 101A South Block New Delhi-
2: The Director General Defence Estates
Raksha Sampada Bhawan Ulaan baatar Marg Delhi Cantt-
3: The Principal Director Defence Estates
Eastern Command 13 Camac Street 7th Floor Kolkata-17 West Bengal
4: The Defence Estates Officer
Itanagar District Papum Pare AP VERSUS
1:Libo Ragmuk aged about 43 years Son of Taduk Ragmuk resident of Talo village PO/PS Menchuka District Shi Yomi AP
2:Eling Ragmuk Aged about 41 years S/o T. Ragmuk residentof Tato village PO/PS Menchuka District Shi Yomi AP
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent : B Pathak
Linked Case : IA(C) 70/2020
1:THE UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF DEFENCE REPRESENTED BY THE DEFENCE SECRETARY 101A SOUTH BLOCK NEW DELHI
2: THE DIRECTOR GENERAL DEFENCE ESTATES (DGDE) RAKSHA SAMPADABHAWAN ULAAN BAATAR MARG DELHI
3: THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR DEFENCE ESTATES (PDDE) EASTERN COMMAND 13 CAMAC STREET 7TH FLOOR KOLKATA-17 WEST BENGAL
4: THE DEFENCE ETATES OFFICER (DEO) ITANAGAR DISTRICT PAPUM PARE AP. VERSUS
1:Libo Ragmuk S/O TADUK RAGMUK RESIDENT OF TALO VILLAGE PO/PS MENCHUKA DISTRICT SHI YOMI
AP.
Advocate for the Petitioner : Ninnong Ratan Advocate for the Respondent :
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SONGKHUPCHUNG SERTO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI
ORDER
Date : 19-01-2021 (S. Serto, J)
Mr. N. Ratan, learned counsel submits that he is withdrawing himself as the counsel of the applicants in all these matters as a new counsel has been engaged.
Mr. T. Ete, learned counsel submits that the learned CGC, Mr. Yadav Duloi would be appearing for the applicants and prays for listing of these matters on 08.02.2021.
Mr. C. Modi, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent/writ petitioner.
List these matters again on 08.02.2021.
JUDGE JUDGE
Comparing Assistant