Jyoti Prasad Das vs. The State Of Assam

Court:High Court of Gauhati
Judge:Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice N. Unni Krishnan Nair
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:11 Sept 2023
CNR:GAHC010165652022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Orders

Before:

Joint Registrar (Judl.) Mr. Chinmoy Baruah

Listed On:

11 Sept 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

GAHC010165652022

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C)/5512/2022

JYOTI PRASAD DAS (ASSISTANT ENGINEER , TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD) S/O- TARUN CHANDRA DAS , R/O- BORDUBI NAVAPUR GAON, P.O- HOOGRIJAN, P.S- TINSUKIA, DIST- TINSUKIA, PIN-786125, ASSAM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS (ERSTWHILE URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT), ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06.

2:JOINT SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN AFFAIRS ASSAM SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06

3:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ASSAM GUWAHATI- 781006.

4:THE MANAGING DIRECTOR ASSAM URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD GANESHGURI GUWAHATI-781005

5:THE CHAIRMAN TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD DIST- TINSUKIA PIN-786126 ASSAM

6:GAURAB BARMAN ASSISTANT ENGINEER ASSAM URBAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE BOARD DIBRUGARH DIVISION CUM ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER TINSUKIA MUNICIPAL BOARD

DIST- TINSUKIA PIN-786126 ASSA

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A R SHOME

Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM

BEFORE JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDL.) MR. CHINMOY BARUAH

ORDER

Date : 11.09.2023

Case taken up before the Lawazima Court.

None appears for the petitioner.

Perused the records.

The office note dated 07.09.2023 reveals that notice was issued to the respondent Nos. 4 & 5 by registered post with A/D on 25.05.2023.

The office note further reveals that learned counsels have entered appearance on behalf of the respondent No. 5 by filing Vakalatnama. As such, service is complete in respect of the said respondent (respondent No. 5).

In respect of the respondent No. 4, it appears that the A/D card has been received back. A perusal of the said A/D card reveals that the A/D card does not bear the initial of the recipient. Further, the track consignment detail is also not available. As such, it cannot be said that notice was properly served on the said respondent.

It further appears that the petitioner has not taken steps by usual Court process as directed by the previous Lawazima Court vide order dated 16.05.2023

In view of the above, the petitioner is directed to take fresh steps for service of notice on the respondent No. 4 by registered post with A/D as well as by usual Court process within 15 (fifteen) days.

Let the matter be listed again before the Lawazima Court in the second week of October, 2023.

Joint Registrar (Judicial)

Comparing Assistant

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(7) - 26 Jun 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 16 Feb 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 20 Dec 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 15 Dec 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 11 Sept 2023

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(2) - 16 May 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 26 Aug 2022

Interim Order

Click to view