Citizen For Justice vs. The Union Of India

Final Order
Court:High Court of Gauhati
Judge:Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Prasanta Kumar Deka
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:13 Mar 2020
CNR:GAHC010015652020

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Honourable Mr. Justice Prasanta Kumar Deka

Listed On:

13 Mar 2020

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

GAHC010015652020

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)

Case No. : WP(C) 1556/2020

1:CITIZEN FOR JUSTICE AND PEACE AND 3 ORS. REP. BY ITS SECY. TEESTA SETALVAD, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NIRANT BUNGALOW, JUHU TARA ROAD, MUMBAI- 400049.

2: ANIMA DEY W/O- KRISHNAPADA DEY R/O- VILL. ASHUDUBI PO AND PS KRISHNAI DIS GOALPARA PIN 783126.

3: NUR MAHAMMAD S/O- LT. IMAN ALI R/O- VILL. MOIRADHAJ P.O. ROWMARI BILL PS DHING PIN 782123.

4: NAMAN UDDIN S/O A HAFIZ R/O- BORBORI PO BELTOLA VIA CHAPARMUKH PS DHARAMTUL MORIGAON ASSAM PIN 782425

VERSUS

1:THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REP. BY THE SECY. TO THE DEPTT. OF HOME AFFAIRS, NEW DELHI. 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REP. BY THE COMM. AND SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HOME DEPTT. DISPUR GHY.- 06.

3:THE COMM. AND SECY. GOVT. OF ASSAM LEGISLATIVE DEPTT. LEGISLATIVE BRANCH DISPUR GHY. 06

4:THE HONOURABLE GAUHATI HIGH COURT REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR GENERAL GHY.-1.

5:THE NATIONAL LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY 12/11 JAM NAGAR HOUSE REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECY. NEW DELHI- 11.

6:THE ASSAM STATE LEGAL SERVICES AUTHORITY GAUHATI HIGH COURT CAMPUS REP. BY ITS MEMBER SECY. GHY.-1

Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M DUTTA

Advocate for the Respondent : ASSTT.S.G.I.

BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASANTA KUMAR DEKA ORDER

13.03.2020

Heard Mr. M. Desai, the learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. M. Dutta, the learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. M. Bhattacharjee, the learned Additional Senior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent Nos. 2, 3 and 6, Ms. A. Gayan, the learned CGC for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. D. J. Das, the learned counsel on behalf of Mr. H. K. Das, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 4.

On the submission of the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, leave is granted to withdraw this writ petition and file a PIL keeping in view the cause pleaded in this writ petition. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal however, with the liberty to file a PIL on the same cause.

This writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal.

JUDGE

Comparing Assistant