$~16

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + CS(OS) 407/2005

AMBA MOTORCYLES THR. SH. SANJEEV KAPOOR

..... Plaintiff

Through Mr. Subul Singh, Adv.

versus

MAHAVIR PRASAD C+

..... Defendant

Through Ms. Parul Singh, Adv.

CORAM: ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS), JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

O R D E R

% 02.05.2016

IA No. 2693/2016 under Order 22 Rule 10 CPC r/w Order I Rule 10 r/w section 151 CPC moved on behalf of plaintiff for arraying M/s Motoplast Components" (owner of trademark TOP) as plaintiff no. 2.

Learned counsel for defendant has no objection to the captioned application. In view of the same and in view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed. At request and in view of no objection of learned counsel for defendant, plaintiff is permitted to make consequential amendment in the plaint and accordingly file amended plaint and memo of parties within two weeks. IA is accordingly disposed of.

CS(OS) 407/2005

DW-1 is present for his further cross-examination. However learned counsel for plaintiff has requested that further evidence of

Contd......2

DW-1 may be recorded after amended plaint and amended memo of parties comes on record. The said request is not opposed by learned counsel for defendant. Accordingly, re-notify for cross-examination of DW-1 on 10.11.2016 at 12.00 noon.

ASHUTOSH KUMAR (DHJS) JOINT REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL)

MAY 02, 2016/cd