Meena Agarwal vs. A.I.I.M.S.

Final Order

Court:High Court, Delhi

Judge:Hon'ble Unknown Judge

Case Status:Unknown Status

Order Date:16 Nov 2004

CNR:DLHC010233782003

AI Summary

A writ petition filed by Meena Agarwal against All India Institute Of Medical Sciences concerning academic institution matters was decided by the Delhi High Court on November 16, 2004. This case involves administrative and procedural issues related to academic institutions in India.

Ratio Decidendi:

Unable to extract ratio decidendi due to unavailability of detailed order text. The order is a final order on academic institution matters but specific legal principles established are not discernible from metadata.

Obiter Dicta:

No obiter dicta remarks are discernible from the available metadata.

Case Identifiers

Primary Case No:213400034472003

Case Type:Writ Petition (Civil)

Case Sub-Type:Matters Pertaining To Academic Institutions

Secondary Case Numbers:23378/2003, 3447/2003, DLHC010233782003

Order Date:2004-11-16

Filing Year:2003

Court:Delhi High Court

Bench:Single Judge

Petitioner's Counsel

Akhtar Hussain

Advocate - Appeared

Neeraj

Advocate - Appeared

Advocates on Record

Mukul Gupta

M.A. Hussain

Dusyant Sisodiya

eCourtsIndia AI^TM

Brief Facts Summary

Meena Agarwal filed a writ petition against All India Institute Of Medical Sciences concerning matters pertaining to academic institutions. The case was registered on May 20, 2003, with the first hearing on January 20, 2004. Multiple pleadings including replies and rejoinders were filed between July and September 2003. The case was decided by the Delhi High Court on November 16, 2004.

Timeline of Events

2003-05-20

Case registered as Writ Petition (Civil) No. 23378/2003 with Registration No. 3447/2003

2003-07-30

Reply filed by Mukul Gupta (Document No. 27535)

2003-09-05

Second reply filed by Mukul Gupta (Document No. 33385)

2003-09-15

Rejoinder filed by M.A. Hussain (Document No. 34734)

2004-01-20

First hearing date in Delhi High Court

2004-02-12

Process fee filed by Dusyant Sisodiya (Document No. 6460)

2004-11-16

Final order passed by Delhi High Court

Key Factual Findings

Case was filed as a writ petition concerning academic institution matters

Source: Case metadata and filing documents

Meena Agarwal was the petitioner and AIIMS was the primary respondent

Source: Case metadata

Multiple advocates were engaged for the petitioner including Akhtar Hussain and Neeraj

Source: Case metadata

Primary Legal Issues

1.Administrative law issues pertaining to academic institutions

2.Writ jurisdiction of High Court in academic institution matters

Petitioner's Arguments

The specific arguments advanced by Meena Agarwal are not detailed in the available order document. However, the petition was filed as a writ petition concerning academic institution matters, suggesting the petitioner sought judicial intervention on administrative or procedural grounds.

Respondent's Arguments

The specific arguments advanced by AIIMS are not detailed in the available order document. The respondent would have filed replies and responses to the petitioner's claims regarding the academic institution matter.

Court's Reasoning

The detailed reasoning of the court is not available in the provided order document. The order is marked as a final order dated November 16, 2004, but the substantive reasoning and findings are not accessible from the metadata provided.

Order Nature:Final

Disposition Status:Disposed

Precedential Assessment

Persuasive (Other HC)

As a Delhi High Court decision on academic institution matters, this order has persuasive value for similar cases in other High Courts and lower courts. However, without access to the detailed reasoning, its precedential impact cannot be fully assessed.

Tips for Legal Practice

1.Writ petitions concerning academic institutions require clear demonstration of administrative action affecting rights

2.Proper documentation and timely filing of pleadings is essential in High Court proceedings

3.Multiple advocates and vakalatnamas may be filed for different aspects of representation in complex academic disputes

Legal Tags

Writ petition jurisdiction in academic institution disputes IndiaAdministrative law remedies for academic institution grievancesDelhi High Court precedent on educational institution mattersJudicial review of academic institution administrative decisionsWrit of mandamus and certiorari in academic disputes

Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

20 Jan 2004

Order Text

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 16 Nov 2004