Hindustan Vidyut Products vs. M.P.S.E. B.
Final Order
Court:High Court of Delhi
Judge:Hon'ble Unknown Judge
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:6 Jul 2005
CNR:DLHC010149642004
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
13 Apr 2004
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
r. No. | Date | <b>Orders</b><br>. 😏 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
06.07.2005<br>$\mathscr{T}_{!!\boldsymbol{O}}$ | |||||
Present: | |||||
Mr. B.Mohan, Adv. for the Plaintiff/Applicant | |||||
*IA 4948/2005 in CS (OS) 367/2004 | |||||
This is an application under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Section | |||||
151 of CPC. The Plaintiff wishes to withdraw this Suit as the matter has<br>already been settled out of Court. | |||||
Copy of this application was served in advance to the Counsel | |||||
for the non-applicant. | |||||
The case has been called out twice since morning but nobody | |||||
appears on behalf of the non-applicant. | |||||
Accordingly, the application is allowed. | |||||
Suit No. 366/2004 is dismissed as withdrawn. | |||||
The application and the Suit are finally disposed of. | |||||
$\mathcal{L}$ | SWANTAD | FPER KUMAR, J. | |||
<b>JULY 06, 2005</b> | |||||
qy, | |||||
After the above order was passed, the Learned Counsel | |||||
Signature Not Verified | appearing for the non-applicant appeared and stated that he has no | ||||
Digitally Signed By.<br>Certify that the digital<br>physical file have been<br>the digital data is as pe | compared and<br>the physical | ||||
file and no page is miss | ng. | CS (OS) 367/2004 | $Pg. 1 of 2$ |
$\pi(\xi)=0$
Date | <b>Orders</b> | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
objection if the application is allowed and the Suit is dismissed as | ||||
withdrawn for the reasons stated in the application. However, he prays | ||||
that his presence be recorded in the order sheet. | ||||
Counsel appearing for the applicant is also present. | In the | |||
interest of justice, the presence of the Counsel is recorded. | ||||
The order is modified as under: | ||||
"Present: Mr. B.Mohan, Adv. for the Plaintiff<br>Mr. Vikrant Singh Bais, Adv. for the Respondent | ||||
*IA 4948/2005 in CS (OS) 367/2004 | ||||
This is an application under Order 23 Rule 1 read with Section | ||||
151 of the CPC praying for dismissal of the Suit. The Applicant prays for | ||||
leave to withdraw the Suit for the averments made in the application. | ||||
There is no objection by the non-applicant. The application is allowed. | ||||
Suit is dismissed as withdrawn. | ||||
Accordingly, the application and Suit both are finally disposed | ||||
of." | ||||
SWANTANTER KUMAR, J. | ||||
<b>JULY 06, 2005</b> | ||||
ďk' | ||||
$Pe. 2 of 2$<br>CS (OS) 367/2004 |
$\mathcal{I}_{\mathcal{A}}$
$\mathbf{1}$
$\cdot\cdot$
$\mathcal{A}_{\mathcal{A}}$
$, , ,$
$\zeta,$
$\sim$
$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$
$\mathbf{v}$
$\frac{1}{2}$
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search