Srajesh Kumar vs. Sunder Malik
AI Summary
A specific performance suit filed by Srajesh Kumar against Sunder Malik in the Delhi High Court, decided on February 18, 2003. This case involves a contractual dispute where the petitioner sought specific performance of an agreement, representing a significant civil matter in contract law enforcement.
Case Identifiers
Petitioner's Counsel
eCourtsIndia AITM
Brief Facts Summary
Srajesh Kumar and Sunder Malik entered into an agreement. Sunder Malik failed to perform his obligations under the agreement. Srajesh Kumar filed a suit for specific performance in the Delhi High Court seeking to compel Sunder Malik to perform the agreement.
Timeline of Events
Agreement entered into between Srajesh Kumar and Sunder Malik
Sunder Malik allegedly failed to perform obligations under the agreement
Srajesh Kumar filed suit for specific performance in Delhi High Court (Case No. 13335/2002)
Delhi High Court issued final order in the case
Key Factual Findings
An agreement existed between Srajesh Kumar and Sunder Malik
Source: Recited from Petitioner Pleading
Sunder Malik failed to perform his obligations under the agreement
Source: Recited from Petitioner Pleading
Primary Legal Issues
Petitioner's Arguments
The petitioner Srajesh Kumar argued that he had entered into a valid agreement with Sunder Malik, that Sunder Malik had breached the agreement by failing to perform his obligations, and that specific performance was the appropriate remedy to compel actual performance of the agreement rather than monetary compensation.
Respondent's Arguments
The respondent's arguments are not detailed in the available information provided.
Court's Reasoning
The court's detailed reasoning is not available in the provided document excerpt. The order is marked as a final order dated February 18, 2003, but the substantive reasoning and decision outcome are not included in the available information.
Precedential Assessment
Non-Binding (Procedural)
This is a final order from the Delhi High Court in a specific performance suit. Without access to the full judgment text and reasoning, and given that it appears to be a single-judge order on a contractual matter, its precedential value is limited. It would be binding on the parties but not necessarily precedential for other courts unless it contains novel legal principles.
Tips for Legal Practice
Legal Tags
Disclaimer: eCourtsIndia (ECI) is not a lawyer and this analysis is generated by ECI AI, it might make mistakes. This is not a legal advice. Please consult with a qualified legal professional for matters requiring legal expertise.
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Case Registered
Listed On:
9 Dec 2002
Order Text
SHRI SHYAM SALES 02-03
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order