Delhi Cantonment Board vs. Smt Reena Kumari Gaur

Court:High Court of Delhi
Judge:Hon'ble Tara Vitasta Ganju
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:16 Aug 2024
CNR:DLHC010027832024

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

First Hearing

Listed On:

30 Jan 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

$~22 & 23

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 22

  • W.P.(C) 1293/2024, CM APPL. 5345/2024, 27769/2024 & 27997/2024

DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Petitioner Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ankur Mishra, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat and Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advocates. versus

SMT REENA KUMARI GAUR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Meghna De, Ms. L. Gangmei and Ms. Surbhi Bagra, Advocates.

23

  • W.P.(C) 5411/2024 & CM APPL. 22347/2024

DELHI CANTONMENT BOARD .....Petitioner

Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel with Mr. Ankur Mishra, Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat and Mr. Tarveen Singh Nanda, Advocates.

versus KAMLESH PANWAR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajiv Agarwal, Ms. Meghna De, Ms. L. Gangmei and Ms. Surbhi Bagra, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU

O R D E R % 16.08.2024

  1. The parties have been briefly heard.

  2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner has relied upon the Judgment in the case of Delhi Cloth and General Mills Co. Ltd. v. Shri Rameshwar Dyan and Anr.: AIR 1961 SC 689 to submit that in circumstances akin to those in the present case, the Supreme Court, while examining a proposition under Section 33 A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, has set aside the order of the Tribunal.

  3. Learned Counsel for the Respondents on the other hand seeks to rely on the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Jaipur Zila Sahakari Bhoomi Vikas Bank Ltd. v. Ram Gopal Sharma and Ors: (2002) 2 SCC 244 and a Judgment of a Coordinate Bench dated 07.07.2022 in W.P(C) 10290/2022 titled Reena Kumari Gaur & Ors. v. Delhi Cantonment Board & Anr. to submit that status quo should be maintained during the pendency of an industrial dispute.

  4. Learned Counsel for the parties request for some time to file their respective written submissions. Let written synopsis, not exceeding three pages be filed by the parties, at least one week before the next date of hearing, along with the compilation of judgments, if any, they wish to rely upon.

4.1 All judgments sought to be relied upon shall be filed with an index which also sets out the relevant paragraph numbers and the proposition of law that it sets forth.

  1. List on 24.09.2024 at 1:00 p.m. in the Supplementary list.

TARA VITASTA GANJU, J

AUGUST 16, 2024/pa

Click here to check corrigendum, if any

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(10) - 16 Apr 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 12 Mar 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 15 Jan 2025

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 24 Sept 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 16 Aug 2024

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(5) - 27 May 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 10 May 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 9 May 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 29 Apr 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 30 Jan 2024

Interim Order

Click to view