Upkar Singh vs. M.P.S.R.T.C. And Anr.
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Hon'Ble Shri Justice Inder Singh Uboweja
Listed On:
12 Sept 2015
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BILASPUR CHHATTISGARH
C-F=100 -
Writ Petition No. (326/2001
Petitioner
12
Upkar Singh S/o Shri Jasavant Singh aged about 40 years, R/o Rinku S.T.D. P.C.O. Bhilai, Distt. Durg (C.G.)
VERSUS
Attested : M.P. State Road Transport Corp. mdents Sd/-Raipur , Depot.No.1, Through : The Divisional Manager, Raipur AR(J) PRO $\mathcal{M}_2$ . M.P. State Road Transport Corp. Through : Its Depot.Manager Enquiry) Head Office Habib Ganj, R.M. Enquiry, Branch-3, Bhopal-6 (M.P.) ice of Presented by Shri de tol ann griller or tor 3. Member Judge, ¢2 State Industrial Court, Bench Raipur (<sup>C</sup>.G.) WRIT PETITION UNBER ARTICLES 226/227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA
Chhattisgarh State Infrastructure Development Corporation, Raipur, through the Managing Director (CSIDC), Ghadi Chowk, Raipur (C.G.)
Contd..2..
LOK ADALAT
1
Chhattisgarh High Court Campus, Bilaspur
W.P. N0. 1326 of 2001
PETITIONER Upkar Singh
Versus
<sup>h</sup> RESPONDENTS
M.P. State Road Transport Corporation & Others
(15
For Petitioner Shri Bharat Rajput, Advocate
For Respondents Shri Avinash Mishra, Standing Counsel <sup>f</sup> CIDC with Shri Bhupendra Shukla, Divisional Manager, CIDC (Transport Incharge), Raipur. o
AWARD
—— (Passed on 12092015)
(1) The parties hvea filed compromise petiio tn.
(2) By way of compromise, both the parties, the petitioner and the respondent — Corporation, have agreed that the petitioner, namely Upkar Singh shall be given reinstatement in service without back-wages which is acceptable t0 the petitioner.
(3) Both the parties to the dispute have also agreed upon that they shall not challenge the order of rnstatement of the petitioner and the petitioner, in turn, shall also not challen he non-granting of back—wages, before any forum or Court of Law. ei ge <sup>t</sup>
(4) In View of compromise entered into between the parties, the writ petition stands disposed of and the orders dated 01-08-1998, 23—06-1999 passed by the
Industrial Court, Raipur in Appeal No. 301/MPIR/90 & Reveiw Application No. 80/MPIR/98 as well as 6/10-08-1998 passed by M.P. State Road Transport, Raipur are hereby set aside. The petitioner shall be reinstated in service without back-wages.
Qυ
(5) It is also brought to the notice of the Forum that the petitioner is already in employment by virtue of interim order passed by the High Court on 11-04-2002. Therefore, the said period of service shall also be taken into consideration for computing the length of service of the petitioner.
(6) The writ petition stands accordingly disposed of.
Sd/-Inder Singh Uboweja Judge Gucti, Sd/-Hen Dockeja) ak Adalat Member - Lok Adalat Chhattisgarh Snaspur (C.G.) High Court of Chhattisgarh Bilaspur (C.G.) 121912015
2