Gobind Shahi vs. The State Of Bihar

Final Order
Court:Patna High Court, Bihar
Judge:Hon'ble Sunil Kumar Panwar
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:10 Jan 2024
CNR:BRHC010872302023

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar

Listed On:

10 Jan 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63945 of 2023

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-139 Year-2023 Thana- HATHAURI District- Muzaffarpur ======================================================

GOBIND SHAHI son of Harish Chandra Shahi R/o- Ramnpur Utar Rampur Hari Ps- Hathuri Muzaffarpur Bihar

Versus

... ... Petitioner/s

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Venkatesh Kirti For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Madhura Nand Jha

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER

3 10-01-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

  1. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 25(1-b)A, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.
  1. As per prosecution case, there has been recovery of one country-made pistol and two live cartridges from the possession of the petitioner.
  1. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He has committed no offence. The petitioner has no concern with the alleged arms and cartridges, which were seized by the police. Only on the basis of suspicion and due to his criminal antecedents, petitioner has implicated in the present case by the

police. He is languishing in judicial custody since 05.06.2023.

  1. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

  2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail after framing of charge, if not framed. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, East Muzaffarpur in connection with Hathauri P.S. Case No. 139 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J)