eCourtsIndiaBeta

Bharat Tiwari& Ors. vs. The State Of Bihar& Ors.

Final Order
Court:Patna High Court, Bihar
Judge:Hon'ble Birendra Prasad Verma
Case Status:Appearance
Order Date:9 Nov 2015
CNR:BRHC010770732013

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma

Listed On:

9 Nov 2015

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11376 of 2013

======================================================

  1. Bharat Tiwari Son of Late Paramhans Tiwari, Resident of Village - Bariswan, Police Station - Shahpur, Circle - Shahpur, District - Bhojpur 2. Hare Krishna Tiwari Son of Late Paramhans Tiwari, Resident of Village - Bariswan, Police Station - Shahpur, Circle - Shahpur, District - Bhojpur

  2. Luxman Tiwari Son of Late Paramhans Tiwari, Resident of Village - Bariswan, Police Station - Shahpur, Circle - Shahpur, District - Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

  1. The State of Bihar
    1. The Director of Consolidation Bihar, Patna
    1. The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Bhojpur At Ara
    1. The Consolidation Officer, Shahpur, Ara, District Bhojpur
    1. Shiv Aadhar Tiwari Son of Late Sheo Bhuwan Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Kapil Dev Tiwary Son of Late Sheo Bhuwan Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Dwarika Tiwari Son Of Late Sheo Bhuwan Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Ramadhar Tiwary Son of Late Sheo Bhuwan Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Komal Tiwary Son of Late Sheo Bhuwan Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Sheo Shankar Tiwary Son Of Sri Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Deo Shankar Tiwary Son of Sri Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Uma Shankar Tiwary Son of Sri Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Gauri Shankar Tiwary Son of Sri Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Hari Shankar Tiwary Son of Sri Tiwary Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Ramji Thakur Son of Deomun, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Shiv Jee Thakur Son of Deomun, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Ramadhar Tiwary Son of Ghar Bharan Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Radha Krishna Tiwary Son of Bhuwneshwar Tiwary, Resident of Village - Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Jagta Nand Tiwary Son of Bhuwneshwar Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Sheo Krishna Tiwary Son of Jageshwar Tiwary, Resident of Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur
    1. Arjun Tiwary Son of Jageshwar Tiwary, Resident ,f Village Bariswann, Police Station - Bariswan, District - Bhojpur

======================================================

.... .... Respondent/s

2/2

Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s<br>:None.
For the Respondent No.1 to 3 :Mr. Ashutosh Singh, AC to SC-1
For the Respondent No. 11 to 14:Mr. O.P. Upadhyay
<pre></pre>======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER

3 09-11-2015 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioners in support of the present writ petition, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners are printed in the daily cause list.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents, on the other hand, submits that concurrent findings of facts have been recorded against the petitioners by the statutory authorities and furthermore, the writ petition suffers from delay and laches. Therefore, according to them, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed.

Be that as it may, since none is appearing on behalf of the petitioners, the writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution.

(Birendra Prasad Verma, J)

BTiwary/-

U

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(1) - 9 Nov 2015

Final Order

Viewing
Similar Case Search