Ramji Choudhary vs. The State Of Bihar

Final Order
Court:Patna High Court, Bihar
Judge:Hon'ble Nilu Agrawal
Case Status:Bail Granted
Order Date:3 Oct 2018
CNR:BRHC010736852018

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal

Listed On:

3 Oct 2018

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.58011 of 2018

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2018 Thana- ATRI District- Gaya ======================================================

Ramji Choudhary son of Late Rambriksh Choudhary resident of village - Belsar, Police Station - Atri, District Gaya.

Versus

... ... Petitioner/s

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kumar Dhirendra Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Bachan Singh

======================================================

CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER

2 03-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 10.07.2018 in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 230/2018 for offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a)(d) of Bihar Excise Prohibition Act 2016.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the police personnel, is that on secret information at village Belsar Badhar near a pyne the petitioner was found preparing Mahua liquor and on seeing the police he started fleeing away but was apprehended and from the place 10 litres of country-made wine and utensils used in preparation of wine was recovered. Accordingly, a seizure list was prepared.

It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is innocent, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and he has been made accused only on suspicion. He submits that charge-sheet has already been submitted and there is no allegation of tampering of the prosecution witnesses.

However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail stating therein that the petitioner is an accused in two more cases of similar nature.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record as well as period of custody, let petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Gaya in connection with Atri P.S. Case No. 230/2018, subject to the following conditions :

  • (i) One of the bailors would be a close relative of the petitioner having sufficient immovable property, who will file an affidavit stating his relationship with the petitioner.
  • (ii) If the petitioner indulges in an offence of similar nature in future, the prosecution will be at liberty to

move the learned court below for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Nilu Agrawal, J)

Rajesh/Pragya

UT