Sri K Hajji vs. The State Of A.P.

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble D Ramesh
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:20 Apr 2023
CNR:APHC010803102016

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble D Ramesh

Listed On:

20 Apr 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 8948 OF 2016

Between:

    1. Sri K Hajji, S/o K Mohammed and Sulthan bi, Aged about 26 years, R/o H.No. 8-84, Main Road, Kosagi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.
    1. KB Shekan bi, w/o Late KB Kadar Basha, Aged about 50 years, R/o H.No. 8-98/2 to 4, Main Road, Kosagi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.
    1. Shakir Basha, S/o. Mohammed, Aged about 26 years, R/o H.No.5/126, Old Post office Road, Kosigi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.

...PETITIONERS

    1. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad:
    1. The Kosigi Grampanchayat, Rep. by its Panchayat Secretary, Kosigi, Kurnool District.
    1. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kosigi PS, Kurnool District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent No.2 directing the Petitioner to shift the chicken and Mutton shops into public park called Hanumantappa Naik park from weekly cattle market without following the due process of law with the police force as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional, unenforceable, ultra-vices, contrary to the settled law and voilative of articles 14, $19(i)(g)$ and 21 of the constitutional of India and consequently direct the Respondents not to insist the Petitioner's shift from the place of the business.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2016(WVMP. NO: 1715 OF 2016)

Between:

Gram Panchayat, Kosigi, Represented by its Panchayat Secretary, P. Ramanjaneyulu, S/o. P. Narsanna, Aged 51 years, Residing at Kosigi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District

...Petitioner/Respondent

AND

  1. Sri K Hajji, S/o K Mohammed and Sulthan bi, Aged about 26 years, R/o H.No. 8-84, Main Road, Kosagi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.

  2. KB Shekan bi, w/o Late KB Kadar Basha, Aged about 50 years, R/o H.No. 8-98/2 to 4, Main Road, Kosagi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.

$\lambda_{\rm{max}}=0$

    1. Shakir Basha, S/o. Mohammed, Aged about 26 years, R/o H.No.5/126, Old Post office Road, Kosigi Village & Mandal, Kurnool District.
  • ...Respondents/Petitioners 4. The State of A.P., Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Panchayath Raj Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
    1. The Circle Inspector of Police, Kosigi PS Kurnool District.

...Respondents/Respondents

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the order dated 18.03.2016 passed in W.P. No. 8948 of 2016.

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2016(WPMP. NO: 11340 OF 2016)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to disturb and interfere with the Petitioners selling in chicken and mutton from present location to any other place forcibly more specifically public park or cattle market, pending disposal of the writ petition, in the interest of justice.

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI. P RAMACHANDRAN

Counsel for the Respondent No. 1: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ & RURAL DEVELOPMENT

Counsel for the Respondent No. 2 : SRI G. VENKATA REDDY (SC FOR $MPP.ZPP$ )

$\mathcal{A} \rightarrow \mathcal{A}$ $\overline{X}$

Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : GP FOR HOME

The Court made the following : ORDER:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITiON No.8948 of 2016

.. .. . .1.; . ■

ORDER:

Constitution of India is filed seeking to declare the action of the respondent directing the petitioners to shift the chicken and mutton shops into public park The Writ Petition under Article 226 of the called Hanumantappa Naik Park from weekly cattle market without following the due process of law with the police force as illegal and arbitrary,

i

t

follows: I I 2. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this HonTale court has passed interim direction on 18.03.2016, which reads as

licence issued by the Gram Panchayat to carry on the trade of selling chicken and mutton in their premises, the petitioners' trade of selling chicken "Subject to the condition of petitioners having the

and mutton shall not be interfered with by the respondents, untilfurther orders."

2

  1. In view of the above interim direction, nothing survives in this Writ Petition. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing the respondents to follow the interim direction granted by this Court and take appropriate action. There shall be no order as to costs.

if any, in this Miscellaneous petitions pending. Writ Petition shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//.

SD/- K. KASI RAO ACHARI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To,

  • Department, State of A.P., 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayath Rai Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur district

    1. Kurnool, District.
  • 6 Two Reddy, sc for Gram Panchayath [OPUC]

  • Andhra Pradesh [OUT! ''evelopment, High Court of

  • 8 Two C?Coptes Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]

PV PV

HIGH COURT DATED: 20/04/2023

ORDER

WP.No.8948 of 2016

DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS $\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{A}}$