IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR '

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 20310 OF 2012

Between:

K Srinivasa Rao, S/o K.Venkata Narasaiah Hindu, aged 45 years, Occ Agriculture, R/o Putlagudem (V) Atchampet Mandal, Guntur District.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The Person Incharge, Sri Kodanda Rama Swamy Vari Devasthanam R/o Putlagudem (V) Atchampet Mandal, Guntur District.
• 2. The Assistant Commissioner of Endowments, Guntur,Near Collectorate Guntur.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the notice dated 28-6-2012, issued by the 1st respondent as illegal, arbitrary and unjust and set aside the same and consequently direct the Respondents follow due process of law. to

I.A, NO: ¹ OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 26044 OF 2012^

Petition under Section ¹⁵¹ CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Stay of all further proceedings arising out of

notice dated 28-6-2012 of the Respondent No.1, including auction and confirmation, pending disposal of the main Writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner : SRI. Y KOTESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent : GP FOR ENDOWMENTS The Court made the following : ORDER

APHC010616172012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3310]

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO

WRIT PETITION NO: 20310/2012

Between:

K Srinivasa Rao, Guntur Dist

...PETITIONER

AND

Person Incharge S K R S V Devasthanam Guntur Dist ...RESPONDENT(S) Anr and Others

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.Y KOTESWAR RAO

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

2. ELEVATED AS JUDGE

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Mr Rama Koteswara Rao, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr Y.Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and it has become infructuous.

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}$

$2.$ Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stands closed.

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- K. L. PAVANI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER

To,

• 1. One CC to SRI Y KOTESWAR RAO Advocate [OPUC]
• 2. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. $[OUT]$
• 3. Three CD Copies

KM

HIGH COURT

DATED:22/08/2024

ORDER

WP.No.20310 of 2012

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS