IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

WRIT PETITION NO: 17620 OF 2010

Between:

$\overline{\mathcal{L}}$

K.Vasudeva Reddy, S/o.K.Rami Reddy, aged 36 years, R/o.Panyam village and Mandal Kurnool District.

...PETITIONER

AND

• 1. The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kurnool, Kurnool District
• 2. Ramaswamy Devasthanam, Panyam rep.by its, Executive Officer, Panyam village & mandal Kurnool District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ petition order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the order passed by the 1st respondent L.Dis.No.B1/3146/2010/Adm./dated 29.3.2010 as illegal, arbitrary, and violation of principle of natural justice and consequently set aside the same.

I.A. NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP. NO: 3293 OF 2010)

Between:

Ramaswamy Devasthanam, Panyam rep.by its, Executive Officer, Panyam village & mandal Kurnool District.

Petitioner/2^nd Respondent.

AND

1. K.Vasudeva Reddy, S/o.K.Rami Reddy, aged 36 years, R/o.Panyam village and Mandal Kurnool District

Respondent/Writ Petitioner

2. The Deputy Commissioner of Endowments, Kurnool, Kurnool District

Respondents/1^st respondent

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim orders passed in WPMPNo. 22256 of 2010 in WPNo. 17620 of 2010, dated 26-7-2010.

I.A. NO: 2 OF 2010(WPMP. NO: 22256 OF 2010)

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the order passed by the 1st respondent in L.Dis.No.B1/3146/2010/Adm/dated 29.3.2010 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P. GANGA RAMI REDDY

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR ENDOWMENTS

Counsel for the Respondent No.2: SRI. V. T. M. PRASAD, SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS

The Court made the following: ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN MONDAY, THE 18^th DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

WRIT PETITION No. 17620 of 2010

Between:

$\overline{a}$

K. Vesudeva Reddy, S/o. K. Rami Reddy, aged about 36 years, $R/o$ . Panyam Village and Mandal, Kurnool District.

....Petitioner

$\mathbb{I}$ $\mathbb{I}$

And

Deputy Commissioner The $\mathbf{O}$ Endowemnts, Kurnool, Kurnool District and another.

....Respondents

ORDER:

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Endowments for the respondent No. 1.

$2.$ The learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that no cause survives in this matter.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as $3.$ There shall be no order as to costs. Interim infructuous. orders if any, deemed to have been vacated.

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any,

shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR NB SECTION OFFICER

Sd/- K. KASI RAO ACHARI

$\mathfrak{g}$

To,

• 1. One CC to SRI. P. GANGA RAMI REDDY, Advocate [OPUC]
• 2. Two CCs to GP FOR ENDOWMENTS, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. $[OUT]$
• 3. One CC to SRI.V. T. M. PRASAD, SC FOR ENDOWNMENTS Advocate [OPUC]
• 4. Three C.D.Copies

$\overline{nm}$

A.D. Fav

$\mathcal{L}$ $\lceil$

HIGH COURT

DATED:18/12/2023

ORDER

WP.No.17620 of 2010

DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS