P Susheela Reddy vs. The State Of Ap
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Listed On:
9 Nov 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO WRIT PETITION No.35558 of 2022
ORDER:
The complaint of the petitioner is that the 3rd respondent-Station House Officer has been interfering with the agriculture activities of the petitioner over an extent of Ac.5.94 cents in Sy.No.323-2, an extent of Ac.4.54 cents in Sy.No.324-2 and an extent of 4.53 cents in Sy.No.324-4 of Maddikera North Village, Maddikera Mandal, Kurnool District. Further complaint of the petitioner is that the respondents 4 to 6 had also been interfering in the said lands of the petitioner due to which the complaint filed by the petitioner in this regard was referred as false in Crime No. 82 of 2022, by the 3rd respondent and the petitioner has a filed a protest petition against the said report.
-
The petitioner would also contend that the 3rd respondent, instead of assisting the petitioner, has chosen to side with the respondents 4 to 7 and is interfering with the agricultural activities of the petitioner apart from threatening the workers who are coming to the fields of the petitioner.
-
The learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home had produced the written instructions given by the 3rd
respondent. In these written instructions, it is stated that the allegations of the petitioner are incorrect and that the 3rd respondent was not interfering with the farming activities of the petitioner in her agricultural lands. It further states that the complaint filed by the petitioner against the respondents 4 to 7 was found to be false and a final report in this regard was also filed before the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class of Pathikonda, Kurnool District.
- Recording the contentions made above, this Writ Petition is disposed of directing the 3rd respondent not to interfere with the agricultural activities of the petitioner in the lands mentioned above, unless the same is required in a properly constituted complaint pending before the 3rd respondent or on account of any directions by any Court. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J.
09.11.2022 BSM
2
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO
WRIT PETITION No.35558 of 2022
09.11.2022
BSM