Bodagiri Satya Likhith Naidu vs. The State Of Ap
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Universities)
Before:
Hon'ble K Suresh Reddy
Listed On:
31 Oct 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
MONDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
:PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO: 35040 OF 2022
Between:
- Bodagiri Satya Likhith Naidu, S/o Tirurnala Naga Prasanna kumar, Aged about 22 years, MBBS Student, Katuri Medical College, Guntur, R/o D.No.25-17-466, 3<sup>rd</sup> line, Srinivasa Rao Thota, Guntur.
...Petitioner
AND
-
- The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi.
-
- NTR University of Health Sciences, Rep. by its Registrar, Vijayawada, Krishna district.
-
- Controller of Examiner, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna district.
...Respondents
Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the $2^{nd}$ and $3^{rd}$ respondents in conducting the digital evaluation process contrary to the Principles laid down in judgment passed in W.P.No.12418/2021 in respect of Petitioner's Final Year MBBS Part-I Course in the subjects of Opthomology papers held in the month of August/September, 2022 and not furnishing copies of the petitioner's answer scripts (for the subject of Opthomology Papers) as highly illegal, arbitrary, irrational, void and contrary to the Principles of Natural Justice and apart from violative of Articles 14 and 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent Nos. 2 & 3 to evaluate the petitioner's answer scripts strictly in adherence to the above stated Judgments of this Hon'ble Court.
IA NO: 1 OF 2022:
$\cdot ,$
Petition filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent allow the petitioner to verify their evaluated answer scripts
physically in the presence of $2<sup>nd</sup>$ respondent university authorities pending disposal of WP 35040 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.
The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of G V S MEHAR KUMAR Advocate for the Petitioner, GP FOR MEDICAL, HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE for the Respondent No.1 and of Sri G. VIJAY KUMAR, STANDING COUNSEL for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3 and the Court made the following
ð ð r ð» ð ð alb
$\mathcal{L}^{(p)}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{(p)}(x)$
ORDER:
$\mathcal{M}_{\mathrm{max}}$
"Registry is directed to print the name of Guttapalem Vijaya Kumar, Standing Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3. At his request, post next week. In the meantime, respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to produce the answer scripts of the failed subjects pertaining to the petitioner by the date of next adjournment."
Sd/- P. VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
$\alpha$
SECTION OFFICER
ITRUE COPYII
$\mathbf{I}$
To.
-
- The Principal Secretary, Medical, Health and Family Welfare Department, Secretariat Buildings, Amaravathi, State of AP(by RPAD)
-
- The Registrar, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna district. (by RPAD)
-
- Controller of Examiner, NTR University of Health Sciences, Vijayawada, Krishna district (by RPAD)
-
- One CC to SRI. G V S MEHAR KUMAR Advocate [OPUC]
-
- Two CCs to GP FOR MED HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, High Court Of. Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
-
- One CC to Sri G. VIJAY KUMAR, STANDING COUNSEL [OPUC]
-
- The Section Officers, Posting Section and Writ non-service Section.
å¹³é¢ å¥œ "ç¹ Contract Res
$\mathcal{H}_{\mathcal{A}}(x) = \mathcal{A}$
$\tilde{\chi} = \chi^{\pm}$
$\tilde{\rho} \to \rho^+$
$\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{M}}(x) = \mathcal{L}{\mathcal{M}}(x)$
$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{A}} = \frac{1}{2} \mathcal{H}^{\mathcal{A}}$
$\mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A}) = \mathcal{L}(\mathcal{A})$
- One spare copy
ER
J
HIGH COURT
$\overline{3}$
$\mathsf{KSR},\mathsf{J}$
DATED:31/10/2022
POST NEXT WEEK.
ORDER
WP.No.35040 of 2022
n NOV 2022 $\mathbf{1}$
DIRECTION