Spl Corsp vs. Ex-Officio Secy

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble D Ramesh
Case Status:Dismissed
Order Date:24 Apr 2023
CNR:APHC010576822012

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble D Ramesh

Listed On:

24 Apr 2023

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. RAMESH

WRIT PETITION NO: 32412 OF 2012

Between:

r

Sri Venkateswara Communications Network, Kuthukuluru, Anaparthi Mandal, E.G.Dist, rep by its Special Correspondent D. Arjuna Reddy.

...PETITIONER

AND

    1. The Government of A.P., rep by. its Ex-Officio Secretary General Administration (l&PR.II) Dept., Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
    1. The Commissioner Department of Iriformation and. Public relations, Andhra Pradesh Samachar Bhavan Masabtank, Hyderabad..
    1. The District Media Accredation Committee, East Godavari at Kakinada. rep by its Convener -cum- District Public Relation Officer, Esat Godavari District.
    1. The District Collector-Cum- Chairman, District Media Accredation Committee. Kakinada, East Godavai Dist.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declaring the inaction of the respondents in not granting press acredation to the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and violative of the 'State and District level press Acredation committees and media Acredation Rules, 2005'framed by the 1st respondent in <G.O.M.S.No>. 96 General Administration (l&PR) Departriient, dated 8-3-2006 and consequently direct the respondents to grant press accredation to the petitioner forthwith for the year 2012 & 2013.

I.A. NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2012(WPMP. NO: 41314 OF 2012)

Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to grant accredation to the petitioner forthwith for the year 2012 pending disposal of the above writ petition.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI Y. VENUGOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION

The Court made the following: ORDER .

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH

WRIT PETITION No.32412 of 2012

ORDER;

I

On 17.04.2023, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, it is posted to today under the caption Tor dismissal'.

Even today also, there is no representation for the petitioner.

Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ

Petition shall stand closed.

//TRUE COPY//

SD/. B. CHITTI JOSEPH / ASSISTANI^GISTRAR / SECTION OFFICER

J

To,

PV

I

    1. Two CCs°0^g<sup>7</sup>foY(OPUCJ
  • (OUTI High Court ofAndhra Pradesh Two C.D. Copies

HIGH COURT DATED:24/04/2023

ORDER

WP.No.32412 of 2012

DISMISSING THE W.P. FOR NON-PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS