[{"_1":2,"_342":-5,"_343":-5},"loaderData",{"_3":4},"routes/cnr.$cnr.$order",{"_5":6,"_160":161,"_340":341,"_238":320,"_240":-5},"caseData",{"_7":8,"_221":222,"_230":231,"_321":322,"_339":-5},"courtCaseData",{"_9":10,"_11":12,"_13":14,"_15":16,"_17":18,"_19":20,"_21":22,"_23":24,"_25":26,"_27":28,"_79":80,"_81":82,"_84":85,"_86":87,"_88":89,"_90":45,"_91":92,"_160":161,"_162":163,"_164":163,"_165":166,"_167":168,"_169":170,"_171":26,"_172":173,"_174":175,"_176":177,"_178":175,"_179":78,"_180":181,"_182":183,"_185":186,"_188":189,"_191":192,"_194":195,"_196":197,"_198":199,"_200":201,"_213":214,"_215":216,"_217":218,"_219":220},"caseNumber","206300335872022","district","EAST GODAVARI","state","AP","caseTypeSub","Category WP ( 28 ) Sub Category MUNICIPALITY AND URBAN DEVP.(MISC.MATTERS) ( 30 )","causelistType","DAILY LIST","courtName","APHC","courtNo",3331,"firDetails",{},"judicialSection","UNKNOWN","historyOfCaseHearings",[29,38,41,43,46,48,51,53,56,58,60,63,65,67,70,73,75],{"_30":31,"_32":33,"_34":35,"_36":37},"causeListType","CAUSE LIST MOTION HEARING","judge","RAVI NATH TILHARI","hearingDate","2022-10-14","purposeOfListing","ADMISSION (MUNICIPAL ADMN.)",{"_30":31,"_32":33,"_39":35,"_34":40,"_36":37},"businessOnDate","2022-11-03",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":40,"_34":42,"_36":37},"2022-11-10",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":42,"_34":44,"_36":45},"2022-12-12","FOR EXTENSION OF INTERIM ORDERS",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":44,"_34":47,"_36":45},"2023-01-23",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":49,"_34":50,"_36":45},"2022-12-26","2023-01-30",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":50,"_34":52,"_36":45},"2023-03-06",{"_30":18,"_32":54,"_39":52,"_34":55,"_36":45},"CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY","2023-03-27",{"_30":18,"_32":54,"_39":55,"_34":57,"_36":45},"2023-04-17",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":57,"_34":59,"_36":45},"2023-06-19",{"_30":18,"_32":61,"_39":59,"_34":62,"_36":45},"B KRISHNA MOHAN","2023-07-10",{"_30":18,"_32":61,"_39":62,"_34":64,"_36":45},"2023-07-31",{"_30":18,"_32":61,"_39":64,"_34":66,"_36":45},"2023-08-21",{"_30":18,"_32":61,"_39":68,"_34":69,"_36":45},"2023-08-22","2023-09-12",{"_30":18,"_32":33,"_39":71,"_34":72,"_36":45},"2023-09-19","2023-10-10",{"_30":18,"_32":61,"_39":74,"_36":45},"2023-10-13",{"_30":18,"_32":76,"_39":77,"_34":78,"_36":45},"SUBBA REDDY SATTI","2023-10-30","2023-11-20","filedDocuments",[],"judgeCode",[83],"1031","subordinateCourt",{},"linkCases",[],"benchName","Single Bench","purpose","interimOrders",[93,99,102,104,106,108,110,112,114,116,118,120,122,124,126,128,130,132,134,136,138,140,142,144,146,148,150,152,154,156,158],{"_94":35,"_95":96,"_97":98},"orderDate","description","View Court Proceedings","orderUrl","order-1.pdf",{"_94":35,"_95":100,"_97":101},"View Spl Cell Orders","order-2.pdf",{"_94":40,"_95":96,"_97":103},"order-3.pdf",{"_94":40,"_95":100,"_97":105},"order-4.pdf",{"_94":42,"_95":96,"_97":107},"order-5.pdf",{"_94":42,"_95":100,"_97":109},"order-6.pdf",{"_94":44,"_95":96,"_97":111},"order-7.pdf",{"_94":44,"_95":100,"_97":113},"order-8.pdf",{"_94":49,"_95":96,"_97":115},"order-9.pdf",{"_94":49,"_95":100,"_97":117},"order-10.pdf",{"_94":50,"_95":96,"_97":119},"order-11.pdf",{"_94":50,"_95":100,"_97":121},"order-12.pdf",{"_94":52,"_95":96,"_97":123},"order-13.pdf",{"_94":52,"_95":100,"_97":125},"order-14.pdf",{"_94":55,"_95":96,"_97":127},"order-15.pdf",{"_94":55,"_95":100,"_97":129},"order-16.pdf",{"_94":57,"_95":96,"_97":131},"order-17.pdf",{"_94":57,"_95":100,"_97":133},"order-18.pdf",{"_94":59,"_95":96,"_97":135},"order-19.pdf",{"_94":59,"_95":100,"_97":137},"order-20.pdf",{"_94":62,"_95":100,"_97":139},"order-21.pdf",{"_94":64,"_95":96,"_97":141},"order-22.pdf",{"_94":64,"_95":100,"_97":143},"order-23.pdf",{"_94":68,"_95":96,"_97":145},"order-24.pdf",{"_94":68,"_95":100,"_97":147},"order-25.pdf",{"_94":71,"_95":96,"_97":149},"order-26.pdf",{"_94":71,"_95":100,"_97":151},"order-27.pdf",{"_94":74,"_95":96,"_97":153},"order-28.pdf",{"_94":74,"_95":100,"_97":155},"order-29.pdf",{"_94":77,"_95":96,"_97":157},"order-30.pdf",{"_94":77,"_95":100,"_97":159},"order-31.pdf","cnr","APHC010548962022","cnrCourtCode","APHC01","courtCode","cnrCaseNumber","054896","cnrYear","2022","caseType","ABA","caseStatus","filingNumber","44734/2022","filingDate","2022-10-13","registrationNumber","33587/2022","registrationDate","nextHearingDate","judges",[76],"petitioners",[184],"Shaik Kareem","petitionerAdvocates",[187],"P RAJESH BABU","respondents",[190],"The State of Ap","respondentAdvocates",[193],"GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV","actsAndSections","01- CONSTITUTION OF INDIA - 226","taggedMatters",[],"earlierCourtDetails",[],"interlocutoryApplications",[202],{"_203":204,"_205":206,"_207":208,"_209":210,"_174":175,"_211":212},"regNo","IA/1/2022 Classification : Injunction Petition","particular","Injunction Petition","remark","--","filedBy","SHAIK KAREEM","status","Pending","listingDates",[],"notices",[],"judgmentOrders",[],"caveatDetails",[],"entityInfo",{"_160":161,"_223":224,"_225":-5,"_226":227,"_228":229},"nextDateOfHearing","2023-11-20T00:00:00Z","lastDateOfHearing","dateCreated","2025-07-25T09:22:58.694173Z","dateModified","2025-08-22T01:29:12.768954Z","files",{"_230":232},[233,241,245,249,253,257,261,265,269,273,277,281,285,289,293,297,301,305,309,313,317],{"_234":235,"_236":237,"_238":239,"_240":-5},"pdfFile","APHC010548962022-order-1.pdf","markdownFile","APHC010548962022-order-1.md","markdownContent","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 1. | 14.10.2022 | RNT,J | |\r\n| | | Sri P.Rajesh Babu, learned counsel for the | |\r\n| | | petitioner
submits
that
without
following
due | |\r\n| | | process of law, the petitioner's land is sought to be | |\r\n| | | taken for road widening just by
placing the banner | |\r\n| | | on the site, asking the land owner to approach | |\r\n| | | Town Planning Staff for further future action, with | |\r\n| | | request to cooperate. | |\r\n| | | He submits that if the petitioner's land is
to | |\r\n| | | be taken
for road widening, the procedure under | |\r\n| | | Municipal Corporation Act, is
firstly by agreement | |\r\n| | | with
the
land
owner
under
Section
146
and | |\r\n| | | thereafter, if the land owner is not willing to give by | |\r\n| | | agreement, to acquire under Section 147.
He | |\r\n| | | submits that when pursuant to the said banner, the | |\r\n| | | petitioner expressed displeasure
to give the site, | |\r\n| | | the staff of the respondent No.2 stated that the site | |\r\n| | | will be taken for road widening and the TDR bonds | |\r\n| | | by way of compensation will be issued, which is | |\r\n| | | contrary to law as the petitioner cannot be forced | |\r\n| | | or
compelled
to
take
TDR
Bonds
without
his | |\r\n| | | willingness to give the land/property. | |\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | | Sri
G.Naresh
Kumar,
learned
Standing | |\r\n| | | Counsel for the respondent No.2, represents that it | |\r\n| | | is not clear from the material on record, as on | |\r\n| | | today, whether any notice under Section 146 of the | |\r\n| | | Act was given to the petitioner
or not.
He requests | |\r\n| | | for time to seek instructions. He fairly submits that | |\r\n| | | the land of the petitioner cannot be taken for any | |\r\n| | | public purpose, without following due process of | |\r\n| | | law under Sections 146 and 147 of the Act. | |\r\n| | | List on 03.11.2022, to enable Sri G.Naresh | |\r\n| | | Kumar, to obtain instructions in the matter. | |\r\n| | | Till the next date of listing, no coercive | |\r\n| | | action
will
be
taken
against
the
petitioner's | |\r\n| | | land/property nor the same shall be utilized for road | |\r\n| | | widening, without following due process of law. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ________
RNT,J | |\r\n| | | Scs | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------|-------|----------------|\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |","aiAnalysis",{"_234":242,"_236":243,"_238":244,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-10.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-10.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER® TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI **WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n# Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. 29-27-18. Lakshmivarapupeta. Raiamahendravaram. Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n## AND\r\n\r\n#### ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n# ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq. yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second side 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n# IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the WRIT petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No. 1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width x 69 feet length - 153.33\r\n\r\nsq.vards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station. Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 14.10.2022, 03.11.2022, 10.11.2022 & 12.12.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1, Sri M MANOHAR REDDY and of Sri G.NARESH KUMAR, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2. and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n## ORDER:\r\n\r\n\" On the joint request made by learned counsels for the parties, list on 30.01.2023.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of listing.\"\r\n\r\nFor\r\n\r\nSd/- B. PRASADA RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\nSECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nTo.\r\n\r\n- 1. One CC to SRI. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [Oruc]\r\n- 2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- 4. One CC to Sri G.NARESH KUMAR, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 5. One spare copy.\r\n\r\n**NBR** \r\n\r\n $\\overline{a}$ \r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\n $\\mathsf{RNT},\\,\\mathsf{J}$ \r\n\r\nDATED:26/12/2022\r\n\r\nList on 30.01.2023\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\n $\\overline{1}$ \r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":246,"_236":247,"_238":248,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-11.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-11.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE: W.P.No.33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE |\r\n|-----|------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|\r\n| NO. | | | NOTE |\r\n| 06. | 30.01.2023 | RNT,
J
Sri P. Anand Surya, learned counsel | |\r\n| | | appearing for the Corporation prays for and is | |\r\n| | | granted
three
weeks
further
time
to
file | |\r\n| | | counter affidavit.
If counter affidavit is filed, | |\r\n| | | reply affidavit be filed within a further period | |\r\n| | | of two weeks. | |\r\n| | | List on 06.03.2023. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended | |\r\n| | | till the next date of listing. | |\r\n| | | ________
RNT,J
Gk | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":250,"_236":251,"_238":252,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-13.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-13.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.33587 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 7) | 06.03.2023 | CMR, J. | |\r\n| | | At request of learned Standing Counsel for the | |\r\n| | | 2nd
respondent
Corporation,
for
filing
counter | |\r\n| | | affidavit, list the matter after three weeks. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till | |\r\n| | | then. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ________
CMR, J | |\r\n| | | cs | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":254,"_236":255,"_238":256,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-14.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-14.md","## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAYAT (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY. THE SIXTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH RO\r\n\r\n# **WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. $29 - 27 - 18.$ Lakshmivarapupeta. Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n#### ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n### ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq.yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq. yards of the two sites afore mentioned. though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n#### IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e.,\r\n\r\ntotal extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No. 1306/1999) and also Proposing tO take 20 feet W'ldth X 69 feet length - 153.33 sq.yards of petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards Of Vacant Site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading tO Balajipeta, backside tO RajamahendraVaram Railway Station, RajamahendraVaram East Godavari District, unt'\" further Orders Of this Honourable court, pending disposal of wp 33587 of 2022, on the file Of the H',gh Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming On for hearing, upon Perusing the Petition and the affidav'lt filed in support thereof and the earlier orders of the High Court dated 14.10.2022103.ll.2022,10.ll.2022112.12.2022126.12.2022 & 30.01.2023 made herein and upon hear'lng the arguments of sri p RAJESH BABU Advocate for the pet'lt'loners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M MANOHAR REDDY , Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the court made the following\r\n\r\nORDEE: At request Of learned Standing Counsel for the 2nd respondent corporation, for f-fling COunter-affidaV-lt, I-lSt the matter after three Weeks.\r\n\r\nInter-lm order granted earl-Ier iS extended till then.\"\r\n\r\nsd/-G. SRINIVAS REDDY\r\n\r\nASSISTAN\r\n\r\n# //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n# For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\nTol\r\n\r\n- 1. One CC to SRl. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 2. One CC to SRL M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV ,High Coun Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- 4. OnespareCOPy.\r\n\r\nNBR\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\nHIGH COURT\r\n\r\nCMR, J\r\n\r\nDATED:06.03.2023\r\n\r\nORDER\r\n\r\nList the matter after three weeks\r\n\r\nWPINo.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":258,"_236":259,"_238":260,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-15.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-15.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE NO.: W.P.No.33587 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 8) | 27.03.2023 | CMR, J. | |\r\n| | | At request
of learned Standing Counsel for 2nd | |\r\n| | | respondent, for filing counter-affidavit,
list the matter | |\r\n| | | after three
weeks. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till then. | |\r\n| | | ________
CMR, J
cs | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)",{"_234":262,"_236":263,"_238":264,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-17.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-17.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 9. | 17.04.2023 | RNT,J | |\r\n| | | Learned counsel for the respondents prays
for and is granted three (03)
weeks time to file the
counter affidavit.
If
counter
affidavit
is
filed,
the
reply/rejoinder affidavit, if any, may be filed within
a further period of two (02) weeks.
List on 19.06.2023.
Interim order granted earlier
is extended till
the next date of listing.
________
RNT,J
Scs | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":266,"_236":267,"_238":268,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-19.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-19.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE: W.P.No. 33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.No. | DATE | ORDER | Office
Note |\r\n|--------|--------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 10. | 19.06.2023 BKM, J | List on $10.07.2023$ . | |\r\n| | | In the meanwhile, counters shall be filed | |\r\n| | | by the respondents.
Interim order granted earlier by this | |\r\n| | | Court dated 17.04.2023 is extended till then | |\r\n| | | from today. | |\r\n| | | The office is directed to print the name of
the learned Standing Counsel for the $2^{nd}$ | |\r\n| | | respondent. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | BKM, J
UPS | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":270,"_236":271,"_238":272,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-22.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-22.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE: W.P.No. 33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.No. | $\\operatorname{DATE}$ | ORDER | Office
Note |\r\n|--------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 12. | $31.07.2023$ BKM, J | | |\r\n| | | For filing counters by the respondents, | |\r\n| | | list on $21.08.2023$ . | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier by this court | |\r\n| | | dated 14.10.2022 is extended till then from | |\r\n| | | today. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | BKM, J
UPS | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":274,"_236":275,"_238":276,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-25.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-25.md","## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE : PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN\r\n\r\n## **WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door $29 - 27 - 18$ , Lakshmivarapupeta, No. Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n#### ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\nTRANSFORM\r\n\r\nWith and\r\n\r\n#### ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e. Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law, ye rise of\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022: Laborate Valvay Culton.\r\n\r\nTHE Hone of creaming\r\n\r\nvisit of DASTE $\\mathbb{R}^{\\mathbb{C}} \\rightarrow \\mathbb{R}^{\\mathbb{C}} \\oplus \\mathbb{R}^{\\mathbb{C}} \\oplus \\mathbb{R}^{\\mathbb{C}}$ . nevan ar part. the state of the state n Rubbi mente da\r\n\r\nTIP THE Petitioner reliable.\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No.\r\n\r\n1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width x 69 feet length - 153.33 sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\n网络小脑加多的石计程序\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ $\\mathcal{A}^{\\mathcal{A}}_{\\mathcal{A}} = \\mathcal{A}^{\\mathcal{A}}_{\\mathcal{A}} \\mathcal{A}^{\\mathcal{A}}_{\\mathcal{A}} \\mathcal{A}^{\\mathcal{A}}_{\\mathcal{A}}$ \r\n\r\n**SECTION AND DESCRIPTION** 1. 中国下来的国家\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 14.10.2022, 03.11.2022, 10.11.2022, 12.12.2022, 26.12.2022, 30.01.2023, 06.03.2023. 27.03.2023, 17.04.2023, 19.06.2023, 10.07.2023 & 31.07.2023 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\n**CORESTIC** \"For filing counters by the respondents, list on 12.09.2023.\r\n\r\ntalt dur No.\r\n\r\nway I on Dr. T-Alms.\r\n\r\nand deterministic content for\r\n\r\n**AWANDAMA** \r\n\r\nThe BUTTER\r\n\r\nThe state of the\r\n\r\nand make\r\n\r\n**CK期地址** \r\n\r\na with abstract\r\n\r\nStanding Men 2015 $\\mathcal{A} \\mathcal{A} \\mathcal{A} \\mathcal{A} \\mathcal{A} \\mathcal{A}$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\nis agained in\r\n\r\nIn the meanwhile, interim order granted earlier by this court dated 14.10.2022 is extended till then are beam. $-17.5 \\times 10^{-1} \\text{ J} \\text{ V} = 33.01 \\text{ G} + 30.2 \\text{ C}$ \r\n\r\nSdi- A: VIJAY BABU\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\nASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\nis ear find the Inc.\r\n\r\nTo.\r\n\r\n1. One CC to SRI P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 4. One spare copy. $\\mathcal{L}$ the respect $\\mathcal{L}$ .\r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{I}$ \r\n\r\n**NBR** \r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\nade matter\r\n\r\nHigher State 平面一起一点。 **CARL MANAGER** Report of Tam.\r\n\r\n $\\mathbb{R}^2 \\times \\mathbb{R}^2$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathbb{R}^{n+1} \\to \\mathbb{R}^{n+1}$ \r\n\r\n**特別** \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{A}} = \\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{A}} \\mathcal{A}_{\\mathcal{A}}$ \r\n\r\n $\\tilde{\\gamma}_{\\bullet\\bullet}$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{M}^{\\text{max}}_{\\text{max}}$ \r\n\r\nBKM, J\r\n\r\nDATED:22.08.2023\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nNOTE: list on 12.09.2023.\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L} \\times \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\mathcal{L}$ \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":278,"_236":279,"_238":280,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-26.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-26.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No.W.P.No.33587 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| S1.
$\\rm No$ | $\\operatorname{DATE}$ | ORDER | Office
$Note \\\\$ |\r\n|-----------------|-------------------------|-----------------------------------------------|---------------------|\r\n| 14. | 19.09.2023 RNT,J | | |\r\n| | | List on $10.10.2023$ .
1. | |\r\n| | | $2.$
Interim order granted earlier shall | |\r\n| | | stand extended till the next date of listing. | |\r\n| | | $\\text{RNT, J}$ | |\r\n| | | $\\rm{RKS}$ | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":282,"_236":283,"_238":284,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-28.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-28.md","## HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE: W.P No. 33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| Sl.No. | $\\operatorname{DATE}$ | ORDER | Office
Note |\r\n|--------|-------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| 15. | $\\boxed{13.10.2023} \\text{ BKM, J}$ | | |\r\n| | | For filing counters by the respondents, | |\r\n| | | list after Dussehra Vacation, 2023. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier by this court | |\r\n| | | dated 14.10.2022 is extended till then. | |\r\n| | | BKM, J
$\\operatorname{UPS}$ | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":286,"_236":287,"_238":288,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-29.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-29.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) FRIDAY, THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.KRISHNA MOHAN\r\n\r\n#### WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. $29 - 27 - 18$ . Lakshmivarapupeta. Rajamahendravaram. Rájamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### **AND**\r\n\r\n## ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq.yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n# IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No.\r\n\r\n1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width x 69 feet length - 153.33 sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 14.10.2022, 03.11.2022, 10.11.2022, 12.12.2022, 26.12.2022, $10.11.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12.12.2022$ , $12$ $06.03.2023.\\ \\ 27.03.2023\\ \\ ,\\ \\ 17.04.2023,$ 30.01.2023 $19.06.2023 , 10.07.2023, 31.07.2023$ 22.08.2023 & 19.09.2023 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n### ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"For filing counters by the respondents, list after Dussehra Vacation, 2023.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier by this court dated 14.10.2022 is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\n> SD/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR les\r\n\r\n> > SECTION OFFICER\r\n\r\n//TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nFor $\\lambda$ \r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n\\* One CC to SRI. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC]\r\n\r\n2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n\r\n3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n\r\nOne spare copy.\r\n\r\npsk\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}\\mathcal{L}^{\\mathcal{L}}_{\\mathcal{L}}$ \r\n\r\nBKM, J\r\n\r\nDATED:13.10.2023\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\n# NOTE: POST AFTER DUSSEHRA VACATION\r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":290,"_236":291,"_238":292,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-3.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-3.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI**\r\n\r\n## MAIN CASE No: W.P.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n## PROCEEDING SHEET\r\n\r\n| $S1.$
$\\boldsymbol{\\mathrm{No}}$ | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|-------------------------------------|------------|------------------------------------------------|------------------------------|\r\n| $2.$ | 03.11.2022 | RNT, J
On the request of Sri G. Naresh | |\r\n| | | Kumar, learned counsel representing the | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | $2nd$ respondent, list on 10.11.2022 to enable | |\r\n| | | him to obtain instructions in terms of the | |\r\n| | | earlier order. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier
is | |\r\n| | | extended till then. | |\r\n| | | RNT,J | |\r\n| | | Gk | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n![](_page_1_Picture_0.jpeg)",{"_234":294,"_236":295,"_238":296,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-30.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-30.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI** MAIN CASE : **W.P.No.33587 of 2022 PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| Sl.
No. | Date | ORDER | OFFIC
E |\r\n|------------|------------|--------------------------------------------------------|------------|\r\n| | | | NOTE |\r\n| | 30.10.2023 | SRS,
J | |\r\n| | | At
request
of
learned
Standing
Counsel | |\r\n| | | appearing for respondent No.2, post on 20.11.2023. | |\r\n| | | If counter is not filed by the next date of | |\r\n| | | hearing, respondent No.2-
Commissioner shall appear | |\r\n| | | before the Court along with record. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier,
is extended for a | |\r\n| | | period of Four
(4) more weeks. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ______
SRS,J | |\r\n| | | KA | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":298,"_236":299,"_238":300,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-31.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-31.md","## IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI\r\n\r\n### **WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n### Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. 29-27-18. Lakshmivarapupeta, Rajamahendravaram. Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n### ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n## ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq.yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n## IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No.\r\n\r\n1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width $x$ 69 feet length - 153.33 sq yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated 14.10.2022, 03.11.2022, 10.11.2022, 12.12.2022, 26.12.2022. 30.01.2023, 06.03.2023. 27.03.2023, 19.06.2023, 17.04.2023. 10.07.2023. 31.07.2023. 22.08.2023, 19.09.2023 & 13.10.2023 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1 and of Sri M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### ORDER:\r\n\r\nAt request of learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent No.2, post on 20.11.2023.\r\n\r\nIf counter is not filed by the next date of hearing, respondent No.2-Commissioner shall appear before the Court along with record.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier, is extended for a period of Four (4) more weeks.\r\n\r\n> Sd/- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n#### //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nFor\r\n\r\n**SECTION OFFICER** \r\n\r\nTo.\r\n\r\n- 1. One CC to SRI. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- 4. One spare copy.\r\n\r\n**NBR** \r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_0.jpeg)\r\n\r\n# **HIGH COURT**\r\n\r\n $\\text{SRS},\\,\\text{J}$ \r\n\r\nDATED:30.10.2023\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nNOTE: post on 20.11.2023.\r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_3_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":302,"_236":303,"_238":304,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-4.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-4.md","# (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) < IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATION THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022\r\n\r\n#### Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. $29 - 27 - 18.$ Lakshmivarapupeta, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n# **AND**\r\n\r\n#### ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n### ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq.yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = $153.33$ sq.yards of Petitioner's second side 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n# IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No. 1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width $x$ 69 feet length - 153.33 sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Order of the High Court dated 14.10.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1, Sri M MANOHAR REDDY and of Sri G.NARESH KUMAR. Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n## ORDER:\r\n\r\n\"On the request of Sri G.Naresh Kumar, learned counsel representing the 2^nd respondent, list on 10.11.2022 to enable him to obtain instructions in terms of the earlier order.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till then.\"\r\n\r\n# Sd/- S.SRINIVASA PRASAD **ASSISTANT REGISTRAR**\r\n\r\nFor ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\n# //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\nŁ\r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. One CC to SRI. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- One CC to Sri G.NARESH KUMAR, Standing Counsel IOPUCI\r\n\r\n $\\mathcal{L} = \\{1, 2, \\ldots, n\\}$ \r\n\r\n5. One spare copy.\r\n\r\n**ER** \r\n\r\nJ\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\nRNT, J\r\n\r\nDATED: 03/11/2022\r\n\r\nLIST ON 10.11.2022\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\n**INTERIM ORDER EXTENDED** \r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":306,"_236":307,"_238":308,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-5.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-5.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE: W.P. No. 33587 of 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|---------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | | | |\r\n| 03. | 10.11.2022 | RNT,
J | |\r\n| | | Sri G. Naresh Kumar, learned counsel, | |\r\n| | | representing respondent
No.2, prays for and is | |\r\n| | | granted three weeks further time to file counter | |\r\n| | | affidavit. | |\r\n| | | List on 12.12.2022. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended | |\r\n| | | till the next date of listing. | |\r\n| | | _________ | |\r\n| | | RNT, J
Dsr | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":310,"_236":311,"_238":312,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-7.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-7.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE |\r\n|-----------|------------|------------------------------------------------|--------|\r\n| NO.
4. | 12.12.2022 | RNT,J | NOTE |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | As last chance, for filing counter affidavit, | |\r\n| | | post on 26.12.2022. | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till | |\r\n| | | the
next date of listing. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | ________ | |\r\n| | | RNT,J | |\r\n| | | sj | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------|-------|----------------|\r\n| | | | |",{"_234":314,"_236":315,"_238":316,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-8.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-8.md","# IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) MONDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI **WRIT PETITION NO: 33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## Between:\r\n\r\nShaik Kareem, S/o of Shaik Ismail, Muslim, Business, aged 55 years R/o Door No. 29-27-18. Lakshmivarapupeta. Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n#### AND\r\n\r\n## ...Petitioner\r\n\r\n- 1. The State Of AP, Rep by its Prl. Secretary, Municipal Administration Department, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur District.\r\n- 2. The Rajamahendravaram Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Rajamahendravaram, Rajamahendravaram District\r\n\r\n## ...Respondents\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action on the part of the Respondent no.2 in placing a Banner proposing to take 189.44 sq yards of site for the purpose of road widening in front of the property of the Petitioner i.e., Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, from out of the Petitioner's vacant site surrounded by compound wall which is of a total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 and also proposing to take 20 feet width X 69 Feet length = 153.33 sq.yards of Petitioner's second side 1020 sq.yards of vacant site situated in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 of Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, back side to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, without following the procedure as contemplated under the Land Acquisition Act, 2013 and proposing to proceed further in taking away the land of the Petitioner of a total extent of 342.77 sq.yards of the two sites afore mentioned, though Petitioner has not accepted for the demand of the Respondent no.2 is nothing but high handed, unlawful, unreasonable and in violation of the Principles of Natural Justice and Fundamental Rights guaranteed under Art. 14, 21 and 300 - A of the Constitution of India and Rules made there under by consequently directing the Respondent no.2 not to acquire the properties of the Petitioner aforementioned without following due process of law.\r\n\r\n### IA NO: 1 OF 2022:\r\n\r\nPetition is filed under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the WRIT petition, the High Court may be pleased to Grant Interim Orders of Injunction restraining the Respondent no.2, their men, staff and all those persons claiming right under the Respondent no.2 from not interfering with the possession and enjoyment of the properties of the Petitioner i.e., total extent of 780 sq.yards in T.S.No. 445/2 (as per Regd. Sale Deed doc.No. 1306/1999) and also proposing to take 20 feet width x 69 feet length - 153.33 sq.yards of Petitioner's second site 1020 sq.yards of vacant site in R.S.No. 457 and 1044/2 (as per Regd. Sale deeds doc.No. 993/1997 and 462/2000) existing in Ava Road leading to Balajipeta, backside to Rajamahendravaram Railway Station, Rajamahendravaram East Godavari District, until further orders of this Honourable Court, Pending disposal of WP 33587 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.\r\n\r\nThe petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the earlier Orders of the High Court dated made herein and upon hearing the 14.10.2022, 03.11.2022 & 10.11.2022 arguments of Sri P RAJESH BABU Advocate for the Petitioners and of GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV for the Respondent No.1, Sri M MANOHAR REDDY and of Sri G.NARESH KUMAR, Standing Counsel for Respondent No.2, and the Court made the following\r\n\r\n#### **ORDER:**\r\n\r\n\" As last chance, for filing counter affidavit, post on 26.12.2022.\r\n\r\nInterim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of listing.\"\r\n\r\n# Sd/- S. SRINIVASA PRASAD ASSISTANT REGISTRAR $\\varnothing$\r\n\r\n# //TRUE COPY//\r\n\r\n## For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR\r\n\r\nTo,\r\n\r\n- 1. One CC to SRI. P RAJESH BABU Advocate [OPUC]\r\n- 2. One CC to SRI. M MANOHAR REDDY, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 3. Two CCs to GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV, High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]\r\n- 4. One CC to Sri G.NARESH KUMAR, Standing Counsel [OPUC]\r\n- 5. One spare copy.\r\n\r\n# **NBR**\r\n\r\n**HIGH COURT** \r\n\r\n $\\mathsf{RNT},\\,\\mathsf{J}$ \r\n\r\n $\\mathbf{1}$ \r\n\r\n4\r\n\r\nś\r\n\r\nDATED:12/12/2022\r\n\r\npost on 26.12.2022\r\n\r\n**ORDER** \r\n\r\nWP.No.33587 of 2022\r\n\r\nINTERIM ORDER EXTENDED\r\n\r\n![](_page_2_Picture_7.jpeg)",{"_234":318,"_236":319,"_238":320,"_240":-5},"APHC010548962022-order-9.pdf","APHC010548962022-order-9.md","## **HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH**\r\n\r\n## **MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.33587 OF 2022**\r\n\r\n## **PROCEEDING SHEET**\r\n\r\n| SL.
NO. | DATE | ORDER | OFFICE
NOTE |\r\n|------------|------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|----------------|\r\n| | | RNT,J | |\r\n| 6. | 26.12.2022 | | |\r\n| | | On
the
joint
request
made
by
learned | |\r\n| | | counsels
for the
parties,
list on
30.01.2023. | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | Interim order granted earlier is extended till | |\r\n| | | the next date of listing. | |\r\n| | | ________
RNT,J | |\r\n| | | Scs/Srh | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |\r\n| | | | |","descriptions",{"_323":324,"_327":328},"enumFields",[169,171,164,25,325,326],"caseCategory","benchType","enumLookup",{"_169":329,"_171":331,"_164":333,"_25":335,"_325":337,"_326":338},{"_170":330},"Anticipatory Bail Application",{"_26":332},"Unknown Status",{"_163":334},"High Court of Andhra Pradesh",{"_26":336},"Unknown Section",{},{},"caseAiAnalysis","order","order-9","actionData","errors"]

SL.<br>NO.	DATE	ORDER
		RNT,J
6.	26.12.2022
		On<br>the<br>joint<br>request<br>made<br>by<br>learned
		counsels<br>for the<br>parties,<br>list on<br>30.01.2023.

		Interim order granted earlier is extended till
		the next date of listing.
		________<br>RNT,J
		Scs/Srh

Shaik Kareem vs. The State Of Ap

AI Summary

Order Issued After Hearing

Original Order Copy

Order Text

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH

MAIN CASE No:W.P.No.33587 OF 2022

PROCEEDING SHEET

Share This Order

Order(30) - 30 Oct 2023

Order(31) - 30 Oct 2023

Order(28) - 13 Oct 2023

Order(29) - 13 Oct 2023

Order(26) - 19 Sept 2023

Order(27) - 19 Sept 2023

Order(24) - 22 Aug 2023

Order(25) - 22 Aug 2023

Order(22) - 31 Jul 2023

Order(23) - 31 Jul 2023

Order(21) - 10 Jul 2023

Order(19) - 19 Jun 2023

Order(20) - 19 Jun 2023

Order(17) - 17 Apr 2023

Order(18) - 17 Apr 2023

Order(15) - 27 Mar 2023

Order(16) - 27 Mar 2023

Order(13) - 6 Mar 2023

Order(14) - 6 Mar 2023

Order(11) - 30 Jan 2023

Order(12) - 30 Jan 2023

Order(9) - 26 Dec 2022

Order(10) - 26 Dec 2022

Order(7) - 12 Dec 2022

Order(8) - 12 Dec 2022

Order(5) - 10 Nov 2022

Order(6) - 10 Nov 2022

Order(3) - 3 Nov 2022

Order(4) - 3 Nov 2022

Order(1) - 14 Oct 2022

Order(2) - 14 Oct 2022

Same Parties

Lawyers

Judges

Acts & Sections

Search in District Courts Data