C.Laxmi Reddy vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Revenue)
Before:
Hon'ble D Ramesh
Listed On:
13 Oct 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No.33345 of 2022
PROCEEDING SHEET
| Sl.<br>No | DATE | ORDER |
|---|---|---|
| 1. | 13.10.2022 | DR, J |
| Sri<br>K.Suresh<br>Kumar<br>Reddy,<br>learned | ||
| Standing Counsel takes notice for Respondent | ||
| No.4. | ||
| The learned Senior Counsel appearing for | ||
| the petitioner has submitted that the District | ||
| Collector has to submit report to the State | ||
| Government<br>on<br>the<br>objections<br>of<br>the<br>land | ||
| owners and the decision of the Government on | ||
| the objections vide under Section<br>15(2) of the | ||
| Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency | ||
| in<br>Land<br>Acquisition,<br>Rehabilitation<br>and | ||
| Resettlement<br>Act, 2013(for short 'The Act') | ||
| shall be final. Thus, the impugned proceedings | ||
| of<br>the<br>2nd<br>respondent | ||
| dated 18.09.2022 is without jurisdiction and | ||
| contrary to the provisions of Sections 15(2) and | ||
| 15(3) of the Act. He further submits that<br>no |
reasons are mentioned in the rejection order of the 2nd respondent dated 18.09.2022 except stating that the request of the land holders are non-technical in nature and hence rejected.
The learned counsel for the petitioner further contends that while granting permission, the petitioner was required to set apart an extent of 3.80 meters to the municipality for road widening and he has constructed commercial building and hospital strictly as per the approved plan. Now, the proposal is only for widening of 51660 sq.feet. When, that is the case, the area which was kept vacant by the petitioner i.e., 3.80 meters is sufficient.
Hence, in view of the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the respondents are directed to maintain status-quo as on today in all respects, pending further orders.
Post after three(3) weeks.
2
| In the meanwhile, the respondents are | ||
|---|---|---|
| directed to file their counter affidavits. | ||
| $\text{DR, J}$ | ||
| $, \mathsf{tm}$ | ||
