Maddirala Suneetha @ Rajavarapu Suneetha vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission
Before:
Hon'ble Ninala Jayasurya
Listed On:
30 Sept 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA CRIMINAL PETITION No. 7829 of 2022
Between :-
-
Maddirala Suneetha @ Rajavarapu Suneetha, W/o. R. Venkateswara Rao 2. Hemalatha, W/o. Jashi
-
Maddirala Rama Rao, S/o. Sriramulu,
-
Maddirala Yenosh, S/o. Rama Rao.
....Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 4.
AND
-
The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati.
-
Rayayarapu Venkaeswara Rao, S/o. Brahmaiah, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District.
..Respondents/Complainant.
WHEREAS the Petitioners above named through their Advocate Sri Bilaal Ahmed Syed, presented this Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C, praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of grounds filed in support of the Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to quash the FIR No. 3 of 2021 on the file of the Jarugumalli P.S., Prakasam District against the Petitioners/Accused Nos. 1 to 4.
AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and the Memorandum of grounds filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Bilaal Ahmed Syed, Advocate for the Petitioners and of the Public Prosecutor for respondent No.1, directed issue of notice to the Respondent No.2 herein to show cause as to why this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted.
You viz:
Rayavarapu Venkaeswara Rao, S/o. Brahmaiah, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District.
are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearing in person or through an advocate as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the grounds filed therewith (copy enclosed) this CRIMINAL PETITION should not be admitted with in four weeks.
Contd....2....
$\mathbf{2}$
The Court made the following ORDER :-
"Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and also the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor for the 1<sup>st</sup> respondent-State.
Issue notice to the $2^{nd}$ respondent, returnable in four (4) weeks.
Learned counsel for the petitioner is also permitted to take out personal notice to the 2<sup>nd</sup> respondent by RPAD and file proof of the same in the Registry, by the next date of adjournment.
List this case after eight (8) weeks."
Sd.- M. SRINIVAS ASSISTANT/REGISTRAR
SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To
- Rayavarapu Venkaeswara Rao, S/o. Brahmaiah, K. Bitragunta Village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District..
(BY RPAD- along with a copy of petition and memorandum of grounds) 2. One CC to Sri Bilaal Ahmed Syed, Advocates [OPUC]
-
Two CC's to Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., (OUT)
-
One spare copy.
TKK
HIGH COURT
NJS.J
DT.30-09-2022.
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
CRL.P.No. 7829 of 2022.