Maddirala Kancham Reddy vs. G. Raju
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Admission (Cc Matters)
Before:
Hon'ble R Raghunandan Rao
Listed On:
14 Dec 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
:PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4275 OF 2022
Between:
-
- Maddirala Kancham Reddy, S/o. Baya Reddy, Age 46 years, R/o. Reddivaripalli, Tsakibanda Village, Chinnamandem Mandal, Annamayya District.
-
- Nallapureddygari Chinna Nagi Reddy, S/o Rami Reddi, Age 37 years, AB Vari Palli, Tsakibanda Village, Chinnamandem Mandal, Annamayya District.
Petitioners
AND
-
- G. Raju, Circle Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police station, Lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District. Presently working at Pulivendula urban Police Station, kadapa District
-
- S. Vinod Kumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police Station, Lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District
Contemnors/Respondents
WHEREAS the petitioners has presented this case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act. 1971, through his counsel Sri S.Srinivasa Rao, praying that this Hon'ble High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondents/Contemnors for willful and deliberate disobedience action and committed an act of contempt for violating the Orders of this Hon'ble Supreme Court in Arnesh Kumar Vs State of Bihar and Another (2014) 8 SCC 273 while arresting the Petitioners in Crime No. 80 of 2022 dated 14.5.2022 on the file of the Lakkireddipalli Police Station, YSR District and punish the Contemnors Article 215 of Constitution of India and u/s 10 and 12 of Contempt of Courts Act.
AND WHEREAS the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri S.Srinivasa Rao, Advocate for the petitioners, directed issuance of notice to the respondents 1 & 2 herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.
Therefore, you namely;
-
- G. Raju, Circle Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police station, Lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District. Presently working at Pulivendula urban Police Station, kadapa District
-
- S. Vinod Kumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police Station, lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District
be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 31.01.2023, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.
$\Lambda$ ....................................
//TRUE COPY//
SD/- K.TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR $\varnothing$ SECTION OFFICER
To,
-
- The District Judge, Kadapa District, at Kadapa, AP. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the Respondent Nos. 1 & 2 and to return to this Court before 31.01.2023).
-
- G. Raju, Circle Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police station, Lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District. Presently working at Pulivendula urban Police Station, kadapa District
-
- S. Vinod Kumar, Sub Inspector of Police, Lakkireddipalli Police Station, lakkireddipalli Circle, Annamayya District(Addresses 2 to 3 By RPAD – along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
-
- One Spare copy.
RVK
HIGH COURT
RRR,J
DATE: 14.12.2022
NOTE: POST ON 31.01.2023
NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION
CC. NO.4275 OF 2022