Shaik Khaja Bee vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Final Order
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Ravi Cheemalapati
Case Status:Withdrawn
Order Date:26 Dec 2024
CNR:APHC010489442021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Disposed

Before:

Hon'ble Ravi Cheemalapati

Listed On:

26 Dec 2024

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT ¥

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 29455 OF 2021

    1. Shaik Khaja Bee, W/o. Shaik Ameer Basha, Aged- 61 years, H.No.8- 56A, Maaldarpeta, Nandyal Town and Mandal, Kurnool District.
    1. Shaik Jathun Bee, W/o. Shaik Abdul Salam, Aged- 47 years, H.No.8-60, Maldarpeta, Nandyal Town and Mandal, Kurnool District.
    1. Shaik Tajun Bee, S/o. S. Madaarsah, Aged- 46 years, H.No.4-259, Gurralapeta, Nandyal Town and Mandal, Kurnool District.
    1. P. Rafi Ulla Khan, S/o. Abdul Gafoor Khan, Aged- 44 years, R/o. H.N0.7-79B2-3, Nabinagar, Beside Nadigadda, Nandayal Town and Mandal, Kurnool District.

...PETITIONERS

h

O

Js-

AND

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (LA) Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, A.P.
    1. The District Collector, Kurnool District At Kurnool.
    1. The Municipality, Nandyal Rep. by its Commissioner. .
    1. The Revenue Divisional Officer-cum- Land Acquisition Officer, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District.

...RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order, writ or direction, more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of

the respondents in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the land to an extent of Ac.3-41 cents in Sy.No.2313/1C of Nandyal Village and Mandal, Kurnool District on the pretext that the same is acquired by*t^a,respondents even though the draft notification issued U/s. 4 (1) of the LA . Xbt '^dated 1^435 of 1986 as illegal, arbitrary, unjust and violation of Article 14, 21, and-300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the pdaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners land an extent of Ac.3-41 cents in Sy.No.2313/1C of Nandyal Village and Mandal, Kurnool District, in the interest of justice. 11-11-1983 was quashed by order dated 5-6-1987 in

lA NO: <sup>1</sup> OF 2021

Petition under Section <sup>151</sup> CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to dispossess with petitioners from the land in an Ac.3-41 cents in Sy.No.2313/1C of Nandyal Village and Mandal, Kurnool District.

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI D SAI RAM PRASAD REPRESENTING SRI E VV S RAVI KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1, <sup>2</sup> & 4: GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION .

Counsel for the Respondent No.3: SRI SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA (SC FOR MUNICIPALITIES)

The Court made the following: ORDER

APHC010489442021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3332]

THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI

WRIT PETITION NO: 29455/2021

Between:

Shaik Khaja Bee, and Others ...PETITIONER(S)

AND

The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)

Counsel for the Petltioner(S):

TEWS RAVI KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent{S):

  • <sup>1</sup> .GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION
  • 2.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

The Court made the following:

ORDER

Sri D.Sai Ram Prasad, learned counsel, representing learned counsel for the petitioner sought permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition and further submitted that <sup>a</sup> memo to the said effect has already been filed.

Perused the memo. Permission as sought is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be

no order as to costs.

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed.

Sd/- J. SAROJA ASSISTANT REGISTR^ //TRUE COPY//

SEC <sup>N</sup> OFFICER To,

    1. One CC to Sri E V V S Ravi Kumar Advocate [OPUC]
    1. One CC to Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava (SC for Municipalities) [OPUC]
    1. Two CCs to GP for Land Acquisition, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
    1. Three CD Copies

TF

HIGH COURT

DATED:26/12/2024

ORDER

WP.No.29455 of 2021

*

/

DISMISSING THE W.P. AS WITHDRAWN, WITHOUT COSTS

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(12) - 26 Dec 2024

Final Order

Click to view

Order(13) - 26 Dec 2024

Final Order

Viewing

Order(11) - 20 Dec 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(10) - 26 Nov 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 19 Nov 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 6 Nov 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 4 Oct 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 20 Sept 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 27 Aug 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 29 Jul 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 11 Jul 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 2 Jul 2024

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 20 Dec 2021

Interim Order

Click to view