P.Dhana Lakshmi vs. N.Satish Kumar
Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:10 Mar 2022
CNR:APHC010473762021
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
For Appearance
Before:
Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari
Listed On:
10 Mar 2022
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH
MAIN CASE No:C.C.No.2058 of 2021 and W.P.No.18897
OF 2020
PROCEEDING SHEET
| SI.<br>No | DATE | <b>ORDER</b> | OFFICE<br>NOTE. |
|---|---|---|---|
| RNT,J | |||
| 7. | 10.03.2022 | 1.<br>Sri N.Satish Kumar, Executive Officer, Sri Abhaya | |
| Anjaneya Swamy Temple, Appanaveedu Village, | |||
| Pedapadu Mandal, West Godavari District, the | |||
| respondent herein, is present in person. | |||
| The matter was fixed today for framing of<br>$\overline{2}$ . | |||
| charges in view of the order 24.02.2022. As this Court | |||
| found that on the material before the Court, <i>Prima facie</i> | |||
| case for wilful disobedience of the orders 09.11.2020 | |||
| and 09.12.2020 in the writ petition was made out. | |||
| 3.<br>Respondent has filed the counter affidavit. | |||
| After arguing at length, making an effort to<br>4. | |||
| justify the action of the respondents, Sri Mannam | |||
| Venkata<br>Krishna Rao, learned counsel for the | |||
| respondent submits that there was bonafidy mistake on | |||
| the part of the respondent in understanding the interim | |||
| orders passed by this Court and consequently the | |||
| recovery proceedings by order dated 19.07.2021 were | |||
| initiated and the amount w.e.f March, 2021 upto | |||
| November, 2021 was recovered from the petitioner. | |||
| The interim orders are clear. Operation of the<br>5. | |||
| impugned orders dated 04.09.2020 and 01.10.2020 was | |||
| suspended. There is nothing which could not be | |||
| understood correctly. In case of any understanding to | |||
| the contrary by respondent, he could have asked for | |||
| legal advice, but on such understanding could not have | |||
| disobeyed the interim orders. | |||
| Sri Mannam Venkata Krishna Rao, learned<br>6. | |||
| counsel submits that the respondent present in person | |||
| undertakes that the amount recovered from the | |||
| petitioner pursuant to the order dated 19.07.2021 shall |
| be refunded to the petitioner<br>within a period of two | |
|---|---|
| (02) weeks, positively by 24.03.2022. | |
| 7.<br>List on 25.03.2022, in terms of the order dated | |
| 24.02.2022. | |
| 8.<br>The Respondent shall remain personally present | |
| on the date fixed. | |
| ________ | |
| RNT,J<br>Scs | |
Share This Order
Case History of Orders
Similar Case Search