M V Rao vs. M Tirumala Rao
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble K Manmadha Rao
Listed On:
22 Dec 2023
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE <sup>|</sup>
PRESENT \
THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE K MANMADHA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO: 4997 OF 2023
♦U <sup>+</sup> ■ Sections <sup>10</sup> to <sup>12</sup> of Contempt of Courts Act <sup>1971</sup> praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased to take the cognizance of the contempt of this Hon'ble Court committed by the respondents herein in disobeying and not complying with the wTno"226^3^^20^iV^'^ ®-5-2022 in W.P, No. 17746/2014 and
Between:
M V Rao, E-350772, Retired Driver of G years R/o. Flat No. 105, Anirudh Vijayawada, Krishna Dist, A.P 3ypt-ll Depot, S/o. Ramulu, aged about 60 Encive, Rajula Bazar, Ramavarappadu,
...PETITIONER AND
- pmrJ' Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C PNBS, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P.
- ^ M-Y.Danam, The Regional Manager, A.P.S R T C Vijayawada, Krishna District, Krishna Region, at
- uli ^^l^'■^h'^^fj?yaswara Rao, The Depot Manager, A.P <sup>S</sup> R <sup>T</sup> C Vidyadharapuram, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A P
- Krishnf Gannavaram, Vijayawada,
- ^'■**'<^'"9 Officer, Guntur, Guntur District. riSCGSoary <sup>r</sup> srty) (Not
...RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. S M SUBHAN
Counsel for the Respondents: SRI M SOLOMON RAJU
The Court made the following Order:
THE HON'BLE DR.JUSTICE K. MANMADHA RAO
C.C.NQ.4QQ7 of 2023
ORDER:-
This Contempt Case is filed to punish the respondents under provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for not implementing the orders of this Court dated 06.05.2022 passed in W.P.Nos.17746 and 27638 of 2014.
- This Court vide common order dated 06.05.2022 has disposed of W.P.No.17746 of 2014 as partly allowed and dismissed W.P.No.22368 of 2014. The operative portion of the said order, reas as under:
"In view of the above said circumstances, this Court feels that it is just and proper to award 50% of back wages, while directing the respondents/APSRTC to reinstate the the petitioner into service with continuity of service back wages and attendant benefits. The same shall be settled within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Accordingly the Award dated 01.07.2013 passed by the S*'' respondent in Industrial Dispute No. 140 of 2006 is hereby modified."
Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri S.M.Subhan, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared and submitted that the respondents have complied with the Order of 3. this Court dated 06.05.2022 passed in W.P.Nos.17746 and 27638 of 2014.
-
Sri M.Solomon Raju, learned counsel for the respondents is present.
-
Recording the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, no cause survives in this matter for further adjudication and hence the Contempt Case is closed.
There shall be no order as to costs.
As <sup>a</sup> sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any,
SD/- V. DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR
shall stand closed.
//TRUE COPY//
To, SECTfON OFFICER
- PNBS, w"ayatada"krishna A.P.S.R.T.C,,
- A P S.R.T.C., Krishna Region , at
- Rao. The Depot Manaaer AP^rtp 4 Vijayawada, Krishna District, a.r A P-S.R.T.C
- /" M-Shivaji, The Depot Manaoer A P R T p Vijayawada. Krishna District. A.P ^ ' Gannavaram,
- Rap by its Presiding Officer (Not necessai7 Party) ^ Guntur, Guntur District.
- <sup>7</sup> On^ pp i*"-- <sup>o</sup> ?'Jbhan, Advocate [OPUC] 8.' Two CD Copies" Advocate [OPUC]
- Chp
vna
l)a,^ Y\ee^o
HIGH COURT
DATED:22/12/2023
ORDER
CC.No.4997 of 2023