Vidapanakal Dawood Sab vs. Sayyad Mohammad Ghouse

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble M.Venkata Ramana
Case Status:Unknown Status
Order Date:6 Dec 2021
CNR:APHC010450132021

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

For Admission

Before:

Hon'ble M.Venkata Ramana

Listed On:

6 Dec 2021

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.VENKATA RAMANA

IA No. 1 OF 2021 $\mathsf{IN}$ SA NO: 570 OF 2021

Between:

    1. Vidapanakal Dawood Sab, S/o Late Shaik Shah Vali, Age 32 years, Occ-Business, R/o 9-3-876, Sai Nagar, Uravakonda, Anantapur District.
    1. Thirumala Naidu, S/o Easwarappa, Age- 51 years, Occ- Business, R/o. 20-184-7C-13, Hanumesh Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District.
    1. Dunlop Basha, S/o Rahim Sab, Age- 46 years, Occ- Business, R/o 17-1053, Tilak Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District.

...Petitioner/appellants/Respondents/Defendants 1 to 3 AND

  1. Sayyad Mohammad Ghouse, S/o Sayyad Peera Sab, Age- 76 Years, Occ-Business, R/o D.No.4-1189-A, Mahaboobnagar Street, Yerraguntla RS, Kadapa District.

...Respondent/Respondent/Appellant/Plaintiff

$\mathcal{L}^{\mathcal{L}}_{\mathcal{L}}$

  1. Vannnoor Bee, W/o Hussain Peeran, Age- 77 years, Occ- House Wife, R/o 20-184-C1, Hanumesh Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District. ...Respondent/Respondent/Respondent/Defendant No.4

Counsel for the Petitioners : SRI N CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondents : ---

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of Decree and Judgment dt.05-07-2021 passed in AS.No.25 of 2017 on the file of VI Additional District Judge: Anantapur at Gooty, pending disposal of SA No. 570 of 2021, on the file of the High Court.

The court while directing issue of notice to the Respondents herein to show cause as to why this application should not be complied with, made the following order. (The receipt of this order will be deemed to be the receipt of notice in the case). The Court made the following; ORDER:

"Heard.

There shall be interim stay of operation of the decree in A.S.No.25 of 2017 on the file of the Court of learned VI Additional District Judge, Ananthapuramu at Gooty concerned to O.S.No.4 of 2011 on the file of the Court of learned Senior Civil Judge, Gooty, until further orders, subject to the appellant depositing costs awarded by the appellat Court to the credit of the suit in the lower Court.

Notice."

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/- B. CHITTI JOSEPH ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

For ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

To,

    1. The VI Additional District Judge, Gooty, Ananthapur District.
    1. Sayyad Mohammad Ghouse, S/o Sayyad Peera Sab, R/o D.No.4-1189-A, Mahaboobnagar Street, Yerraguntla RS, Kadapa District.
    1. Vannnoor Bee, W/o Hussain Peeran, R/o 20-184-C1, Hanumesh Nagar, Guntakal, Anantapur District. (2 & 3 By RPAD)
    1. One CC to Sri. N Chandra Sekhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
    1. One spare copy.

MSB

HIGH COURT

$\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}_{\text{max}}$ $\text{MVR}, \text{J}$

DATED:06/12/2021

ORDER

LIST DURING THE 1<sup>st</sup> WEEK OF FEBRUARY, 2022

IA NO.1 OF 2021 $\text{IN}$ SA.No.570 of 2021

INTERIM STAY