(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3395 OF 2022

$\frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \hat{f}^{\dagger} = \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \hat{f}^{\dagger} + \frac{1}{2} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \hat{f}^{\dagger}$ $\mathcal{M} \sim \mathcal{M}$

Between:

$\hat{\xi}$

$\tilde{\mathfrak{f}}$

$\frac{1}{2}$

$\mathcal{N}_{\mathcal{A}}$

V.Venu Gopal Setty, S/o. Mr. V. Balayya Aged about 68 years, occ Civil Contractor, R/o.Kurnool Village, Kurnool mandal, Kurnool District.

Petitioner

AND

• 1. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District. $\mathcal{M}_{\mathcal{F}}(t)$
• 2. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District. الأحاص والأراب
• 3. Sri. C. Prathap, The then Executive Engineer, K.C.C Works Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District. ${A_i}_{i=1}^n$
• 4. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, A.P. $\mathcal{L} = { \mathcal{L} } \cup { \mathcal{L} }$
• 5. Sri V. Tirumaleswara Reddy, The Present Executive Engineer, K.C,Canal Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District.

R 5 leave granted as per the Court order dt.08/09/2022 Vide IA No.1 of 2022 in CC No.3395 of 2022. $\alpha_1\leq 2m_2$

Contemnor

Whereas the petitioner has presented this Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, through his counsel Sri V NITESH praying the High Court to punish the Contemnors/respondents herein, for their willful and intentional disobedience of the orders dated 23.12.2021 passed by the High Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in WP No: 30438 of 2021, in the interest of justice.

Whereas the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V NITESH Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondents herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted. $\mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z} \oplus \mathbb{Z}$

Therefore, you namely;

COMPANY $\mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x) = \mathcal{L}^{\text{max}}{\text{max}}(x)$

• 1. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
• 2. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District. $\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L} \times \mathcal{L}$ $\mathcal{H} = \mathbb{R}^2 \times \mathbb{R}^2$

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} \oplus \mathcal{L} \oplus \mathcal{L} \oplus \mathcal{L}$ $\mathbb{E} \left( \mathbb{E} \left( \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{E} \left[ \mathbb{$ $\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{M}}\left(\mathcal{L}{\mathcal{M}}\right)$

• 3. Sri. C. Prathap, The then Executive Engineer, K.C.C Works Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District.
• 4. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, A.P.
• 5. Sri V. Tirumaleswara Reddy, The Present Executive Engineer, K.C.Canal Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 20.10,2022, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte. SD/- E.KAMESHWAR RAO

//TRUE COPY//

$\sigma_{\rm{max}}$

DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

$To$

• 1. The District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.1 and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022).
• 2. The District Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent Nos.2, $3 & 5$ and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022).
• 3. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. (By RPAD - in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.4 and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022).
• 4. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
• 5. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle. Kurnool, Kurnool District.
• 6. Sri. C. Prathap, The then Executive Engineer, K.C.C Works Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District.
• 7. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, A.P.
• 8. Sri V. Tirumaleswara Reddy, The Present Executive Engineer, K.C.Canal Division, Nandyal Division, Kurnool District. (4 to 08 By RPAD – along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
• 9. Two Spare copies.

PR

HIGH COURT

$NV, J$

DATE: 08.09.2022

NOTE: POST ON 20.10.2022

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CC. NO. 3395 OF 2022

$\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$

$\bigg}$