P. Subramanyam vs. Shri Shashi Bhushan Kumar

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:8 Sept 2022
CNR:APHC010446562022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVAT (Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3393 OF 2022

$\mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L} = \mathcal{L}$

Between:

Mr.P.Subramanyam, S/o.Shiva Ramaiah, Aged about 65 years, Occ: Civil Contractor, R/o.H.No.5-149, Lakshmipuram (V), Kallur (M), Kurnool, A.P.

.... Petitioner

AND

    1. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
    1. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
    1. Sri. G.Srinivasulu, The then Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Divison, Kurnool Division, Kurnool Distirct.
    1. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, A.P.
    1. Sri Reddy Shekhar Reddy. The Present Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Division, Kurnool Division, Kurnool Distirct.

R 5 leave granted as per the Court order dt.08/09/2022 Vide IA No.1 of 2022 in CC No.3393 of 2022.

Contemnors

Whereas the petitioner has presented this Contempt case under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, through his counsel Sri V NITESH praying the High Court to punish the Contemnors/respondents herein, for their willful and intentional disobedience of the orders dated 14.12.2021 passed by the High Court in I.A.No.1 of 2021 in WP No. 29453 of 2021, in the interest of justice.

$\tau \in \mathbb{R}^{n \times N}$

Whereas the said case coming on for orders as to admission on this day and whereas the High Court, upon perusing the affidavit filed therein, and upon hearing the arguments of Sri V NITESH Advocate for the petitioner, directed issuance of notice before admission to the respondents herein, to show cause as to why in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support thereof, the said case should not be admitted.

Therefore, you namely;

  1. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.

$\mathcal{F} \colon \mathcal{H} \to \mathcal{H}$

一 正报 管理者

CINCE OF and the form

    1. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
    1. Sri. G.Srinivasulu, The then Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Divison, Kurnool. Division, Kurnool Distirct.
    1. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam. Krishna District, A.P.
    1. Sri Reddy Shekhar Reddy, The Present Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Division, Kurnool Division, Kurnool Distirct.

be and hereby are directed to show cause, as to why the contempt case should not be admitted, either appearing in person or through Advocate, duly instructed on 20.10.2022, to which date the case stands posted for hearing, failing wherein the said case will be heard and determined ex-parte.

//TRUE COPY//

$\mathbb{R}^{n+1} \times \mathbb{R}^{n+1}$

我的时间的时 $\mathbb{S} \cup \mathbb{P} \cup \mathbb{C}$ TAP Fer-

Sd/-E.KAMESWARA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR

SECTION OFFICER

To

    1. The District Judge, Guntur, Guntur District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.1 and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022). $\sim$ 5.10
    1. The District Judge, Kurnool, Kurnool, District, A.P. (By RPAD in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 5 and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022).
    1. The Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, Krishna District, A.P. (By RPAD - in duplicate with a copy of petition and affidavit to serve on the respondent No.4 and to return to this Court before 20.10.2022).
    1. Sri.Pankaj Kumar, The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Water Resources Department (Irrigation and CAD), Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravati, Guntur District.
    1. Sri.Reddy Sekhar Reddy, The Superintending Engineer, Irrigation Circle, Kurnool, Kurnool District.
    1. Sri. G.Srinivasulu, The then Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Divison, Kurnool Division, Kurnool Distirct.
    1. Sri.H.Mohan Rao, The Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District, A.P.
    1. Sri Reddy Shekhar Reddy, The Present Executive Engineer, M.I. Works Division, Kurnool Division, Kurnool District. (4 to 10 By RPAD – along with a copy of petition and affidavit).
    1. Two Spare copies.

HIGH COURT

NV,J

$\frac{1}{2}$

$\widehat{\xi}$

$\tilde{\mathcal{L}}_{\text{max}}$

DATE: 08.09.2022

NOTE: POST ON 20.10.2022

$\mathcal{L}_{\mathcal{A}}$

g g

$\mathcal{A}_1 \mathcal{A}_2 \mathcal{A}_3$

$\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\sum_{i=1}^n\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$ $\gamma_{\mu}^{(3/2)}$

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

CC. NO. 3393 OF 2022

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(3) - 13 Jul 2023

Final Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 13 Jul 2023

Final Order

Click to view

Order(1) - 8 Sept 2022

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(2) - 8 Sept 2022

Interim Order

Click to view