(SHOW CAUSE NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION) IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA (SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF OCTOBER, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR :PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 23857 OF 2024

Betwee n :

Gunammadala Veerabrahmam, S/o Kasaiah, Age. 40Yrs, Occ: NMR & Social Activist, Bollupalli(V), Ardhaveedu(M), Prakasam Dist.

...Petitioner/s

AND

• 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep its Principal Secretary School Education, AP Secretariat, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist.
• 2. The Commissioner of School, Education, Ibrahimpattanam, NTR Dist.
• 3. The Regional Joint Director of School, Education, Guntur, Guntur Dist.
• 4. The District Education Officer, Ongole, Prakasam Dist.
• 5. The Mandal Education Officer, Mandal Parl'shad, Kumbum MandaI, Prakasam Dist.
• 6. The Tahsildar, Arthaveedu (M), Prakasam Dist.
• 7. Peruri Balasivakumar, S/o Venkateswarlu, Age 45Yrs, Occ Govt.Teacher(SG), Bollupalli(V), Ardhaveedu(M), Prakasam Dist

...Respondents

WHEREAS the Petitioner above named through his Advocate Sri GUNDALA SIVA PRASADA presented this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus to declaring inaction of the lSt Respondent to 5th Respondent in conducting departmental enquiry on 7th Respondent fake caste certificate as per the petit'loner

representations without following any procedure under statutes as illegal, arbitrary, high handness and against to the principles of natural J'uStiCe and violative of Article 14,16,19 (1) (g), and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the lSt Respondent to 5th Respondent to suspend the 7th respondent from government Service as SG Teacher pending enquiry on his fake caste certificate BC-A;

AND WHEREAS the High Court upon perusing the petition and affidavit filed herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri Gundala Siva Prasada, Advocate for the Petitioner and GP for Education for the Respondent Nos.1 to 5 and GP for Revenue for the Respondent No.6, directed issue of notl'ce to the Respondent No.7 herein to show cause as to why thI-S WRIT PETITION should not be admitted.

You viz:

Peruri Balasivakumar, S/o Venkateswarlu, Occ Govt.Teacher(SG),

Bollupalli(V), Ardhaveedu(M), Prakasam Dl-strict

are be and hereby directed to show cause either appearI'ng in Person Or through an Advocate, as to why in the circumstances set out in the petition and the afflldavit filed thereWith (copy enclosed) this WRIT PETITION should not be admitted within two (02) weeks, on which date the case stands posted for hearing;

The Court made the following:

ORDER:

l€lssue notice to the respondent No.7.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to take out personal notice to the respondent No.7 by Registered Post with Acknowledgement Due and file proof of service into the Registry within two (02) weeks.

Post the matter after two (02) weeks, along with W.P.No.10220 of 2024-»

//TRUE COPY//

Sd/-M.Srinivas

Tol

• 1. Peruri Balasivakumar, S/o Venkateswarlu, Occ Govt.Teacher(SG), Bollupalli(V), Ardhaveedu(M), Prakasam District (by RPAD-along with a copy of petjtjon and affldavjt)
• 2. One CC to Srl-. Gundala Siva Prasada, Advocate [OPUC]
• 3. Two CCs to GP for School Education, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh. [OUT]
• 4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court ofAP [OUT]
• 5. One spare copy

MM

HIGH COURT

VS,J

DATED:22/10/2024

POST THE MATTER AFTER TWO (02) WEEKS, ALONG WITH W.P.No.10220 OF 2024

NOTICE BEFORE ADMISSION

WP.No.23857 of 2024