Konda Krishnamma vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh

Court:High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Judge:Hon'ble Cheekati Manavendranath Roy
Case Status:Disposed
Order Date:26 Aug 2022
CNR:APHC010420282022

AI Summary

Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order

Order Issued After Hearing

Purpose:

Admission (Municipal Admn.)

Before:

Hon'ble Ravi Nath Tilhari

Listed On:

26 Aug 2022

Original Order Copy

Get a certified copy of this order

Download True Copy

Order Text

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI-(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO :PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

WRIT PETITION NO: 25796 OF 2022

Between:

Konda Krishnamma, W/o Venkata Reddy, aged about 55 Years, House wife, R/o Gollavani Gunta, No.9 Akkarampalli Group, Survey No. 72/2, 72/3, 76/17, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati, Chittoor District.

AND

...Petitioner

    1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Department of Municipal Administration and Urban Development Authority, Secretariat, Secretariat Building, Velagapudi, Guntur Dist.
    1. The Commissioner, Tirupathi Municipal Corporation, Tirupathi, Chitoor Dist.
    1. The Tirupati Urban Development Authority, Rep by its Commissioner, Tirupathi, Tirupati Dist.
  • The Dist Collector, Tirupati District, Tirupati.
    1. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tirupathi Division, Tirupati, Tirupati Dist.

....Respondents

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents herein in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners site to an extent of 266.66 Yards, in Survey No.72/2, 72/3, 76/17 in Gollavanigunta VIIIage, No.9 Akkarampalli Group, Amminaidupalem Gramapanchayat, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati Dist (Old Chitoor Dist) as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Article 300(A) of Constitution of India and further direct the respondents not to lay the 60 feet Road and not to dispossess and demolish the compound wall of the petitioner without paying the compensation to the petitioner under the provisions of Right to fair compensation and Transparency in land acquisition, Rehabilitation and resettlement, Act 2013;

IA NO: 1 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not lay any road on the petitioner's site to an extent of 266.66 Yards, in Survey No.72/2, 72/3, 76/17 in Gollavanigunta village, No. 9 Akkarampalli Group, Amminaidupalem Gramapanchayat, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati Dist (Old Chitoor Dist) without paying compensation to the petitioner, pending disposal of WP 25796 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.

IA NO: 2 OF 2022

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the High Court may be pleased to order stay of demolition of compound Wall and other structures in the petitioner's house site to an extent of 266.66 Yards, in Survey No.72/2, 72/3, 76/17 in Gollavanigunta village, No. 9 Akkarampalli Group, Amminaidupalem Gramapanchayat, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Tirupati Dist (Old Chitoor Dist), pending disposal of WP 25796 of 2022, on the file of the High Court.

The petition coming on for hearing, upon perusing the Petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and the order of the High Court dated 16.08.2022 made herein and upon hearing the arguments of Sri T.V.V.Koteswara Rao, Advocate for the Petitioner, GP for Municipal Administration for the Respondent No.1, Sri K. Suresh Kumar Reddy, Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos.2 & 3 and GP for Revenue for : Respondent Nos.4 & 5, the Court made the following:

ORDER:

"No representation from the side of the petitioner.

Sri P.Anand Surya, learned counsel, representing Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent No.2, prays for and is granted for (04) weeks time to file counter affidavit. $\checkmark$

If counter affidavit is filed, the reply/rejoinder affidavit, if any, may also be ? filed within a further period of two (02) weeks. $\vee$

List on 14.10.2022.

Interim order granted earlier is extended till the next date of listing." -

Sd/- M. PRABAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

SECTION OFFICER

$\mathsf{To},$

$\overline{\textbf{S}}$

$\ddot{\phantom{a}}$

$\mathbf{e}$

  1. One CC to Sri. T V V Koteswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]

  2. One CC to Sri K. Suresh Kumar Reddy, Standing Counsel [OPUC]

  3. Two CCs to GP for Municipal Administration, High Court of AP. [OUT]

  4. Two CCs to GP for Revenue, High Court of AP. [OUT]

  5. One spare copy.

MM

HIGH COURT

$\mathsf{RNT}, \mathsf{J}$

DATED: 26/08/2022

ORDER

NOTE: LIST ON 14.10.2022

WP.No.25796 of 2022

Share This Order

Case History of Orders

Order(16) - 27 Feb 2023

Final Order

Click to view

Order(14) - 13 Feb 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(15) - 13 Feb 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(12) - 27 Jan 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(13) - 27 Jan 2023

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(9) - 9 Dec 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(10) - 9 Dec 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(11) - 9 Dec 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(7) - 11 Nov 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(8) - 11 Nov 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(5) - 14 Oct 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(6) - 14 Oct 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(3) - 26 Aug 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(4) - 26 Aug 2022

Interim Order

Viewing

Order(1) - 16 Aug 2022

Interim Order

Click to view

Order(2) - 16 Aug 2022

Interim Order

Click to view