Shaik Shakeela vs. State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Disposed
Before:
Hon'ble Sumathi Jagadam
Listed On:
8 Jan 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI
MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
WP(AT) NO: 1110 OF 2021
Between:
$\mathcal{L}$
Shaik Shakeela, W/o. late Sattrar Baig, Aged about 56 years, Working as Senior Asst. O/s. Asst. Pay and Accounts Officer, Kurnool Town, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh, Presently on transfer to Kadapa, Resident of H.No.92/5-44-12, Banjara Colony, Balaji Nagar, Kurnool, AP 518006.
...PETITIONER
AND
-
- State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep., by its Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Works and Project, Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District, A.P.
-
- The Director of Works Accounts, C-Block, 3rd Floor, Anjaneya Towrs, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District-521456.
-
- The Joint Director of Works and Accounts, Mamillapalle, T.G.P. Building, Cuddapah, Y.S.R.Kadapa District, A.P.
-
- The Assistant Pay and Accounts Officer, Kurnool, Kurnool District, A.P.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the proceedings in Memo No.DWA/AP/VJD/SN.II/A.1/2017-18/77 dated 30.08.2017 passed by the 2nd respondent and to declare the said Memo as being illegal, and in variance with the mandate contained in G.O.Ms.No.64 dated 21.04.2017 and G.O.Ms.No.72 dated 04.05.2017.
Counsel for the Petitioner(s): SRI. A SRINATH
Counsel for the Respondents 1 to 4 : GP FOR SERVICES I
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION (AT) NO.1110 OF 2021
ORDER:
No representation for the petitioner, even though, the matter is posted under the caption "For Dismissal".
On 23.11.2023, 15.12.2023 and 03.01.2024 also, there was no $2.$ representation for the petitioner.
Learned Government Pleader for Services-I submitted that the 3. petitioner was retired on 31.08.2021 from service on attaining the age of superannuation and the cause of action does not survive in the present Writ Petition.
Recording the submission made by the learned Government $4.$ Pleader for Services-I, the Writ Petition (AT) is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
Sd/- A. VIJAYA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
//TRUE COPY//
SECTION OFFICER
To,
One CC to SRI. A SRINATH Advocate [OPUC] Two CCs to GP for SERVICES I, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
- Three CD Copies
Madhu
HIGH COURT
DATED:08/01/2024
ORDER
WP(AT).No.1110 of 2021
DISMISSING THE WP AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS
