K Radhamma vs. The State Of Andhra Pradesh
AI Summary
Get an AI-powered analysis of this court order
Order Issued After Hearing
Purpose:
Admission (Civil Supplies)
Before:
Hon'ble B S Bhanumathi
Listed On:
23 Sept 2024
Original Order Copy
Get a certified copy of this order
Order Text
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3311]
MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20695/2024
Between:
K Radhamma ...PETITIONER
AND
The State of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S)
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K Narsi Reddy
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP for Civil Supplies
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:
…to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4 thand 5threspondents in not allotting the essential commodities to the petitioner in F.P shop (Shop No.1201032),Muradi Village, D. Hirehal Mandal, Anantapur District without there being any suspension or cancellation of authorization of the petitioner even though the authorization is valid and subsisting as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India and also violative of Andhra Pradesh State Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2018 and principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner's F.P shop dealership by supplying the essential commodities to the FP Shop.No.1201032, of Muradi Village, D.Hirehal Mandal, Anantapur District…
-
The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that without passing any order of suspension or cancellation of authorization, the petitioner is not being provided essential commodities.
-
The learned Assistant Government Pleader submitted that the written instructions are not received. However, he stated that so long as the authorization is in force, the supply of commodities would not be stopped, but if authorization is suspended or cancelled, the petitioner would not be supplied any commodities.
-
Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent authorities to supply the commodities to the petitioner, subject to compliance of legal formalities, so long as the authorization is in force.However, this order does not preclude the authorities from taking any action as per law.There shall be no orders as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________ ___ JUSTICE B.S. BHANUMATHI
Dated 23.09.2024 K M S
BSB, J W.P.No.20695 of 2024
132
THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 20695 of 2024
Date: 23.09.2024 KMS